Trio-Tech International (TRT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Trio-Tech International (TRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $134.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($13.99 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Trio-Tech International to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Trio-Tech International Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Trio-Tech International across 32 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Trio-Tech International growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Trio-Tech International (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Trio-Tech International. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TRT company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $371.00K | $7.08 Million | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $2.72 Million | $10.96 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2023 | 0.64x | $8.11 Million | $12.62 Million | ▲ +366.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $2.12 Million | $15.42 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $1.64 Million | $12.25 Million | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $3.01 Million | $10.51 Million | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2019 | 0.38x | $4.45 Million | $11.67 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2018 | 0.35x | $4.48 Million | $12.97 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $3.95 Million | $11.97 Million | ▲ +269.6% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $1.01 Million | $11.35 Million | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $4.09 Million | $11.31 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $3.86 Million | $13.76 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $3.49 Million | $15.44 Million | ▲ +208.1% |
| 2012 | -0.21x | $-3.66 Million | $17.49 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 2011 | 0.40x | $4.55 Million | $11.38 Million | ▲ +14817.2% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | $50.00K | $18.65 Million | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $1.01 Million | $5.17 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.91 Million | $9.81 Million | ▼ -78.2% |
| 2007 | 0.89x | $7.94 Million | $8.89 Million | ▲ +1128.5% |
| 2006 | -0.09x | $-850.00K | $9.80 Million | ▼ -165.6% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $924.00K | $6.99 Million | ▼ -51.1% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $1.86 Million | $6.87 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $1.26 Million | $6.01 Million | ▲ +199.0% |
| 2002 | -0.21x | $-1.72 Million | $8.14 Million | ▼ -142.1% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | $5.01 Million | $9.99 Million | ▲ +504.6% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $801.00K | $9.65 Million | ▲ +1127.8% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $50.00K | $7.40 Million | ▼ -81.1% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $300.00K | $8.40 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | $2.30 Million | $8.50 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1996 | 0.46x | $4.40 Million | $9.60 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $1.90 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 1994 | 0.24x | $1.60 Million | $6.80 Million | — |