UNITIL Corporation (UTL) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
UNITIL Corporation (UTL) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 3.50x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 4% of its operating cash flow ($15.60 Million) in capital expenditures ($54.60 Million). See UNITIL Corporation net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
UNITIL Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1994–2024)
This chart tracks UNITIL Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. Check UNITIL Corporation total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for UNITIL Corporation (1994–2024)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for UNITIL Corporation from 1994 to 2024. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see UNITIL Corporation (UTL) total market value.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.35x | $125.90 Million | $169.90 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2023 | 1.32x | $107.00 Million | $141.00 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2022 | 1.25x | $97.70 Million | $122.10 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2021 | 1.07x | $107.80 Million | $115.00 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2020 | 1.62x | $75.70 Million | $122.60 Million | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2019 | 1.14x | $104.90 Million | $119.20 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2018 | 1.30x | $78.50 Million | $102.40 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2017 | 1.38x | $86.20 Million | $119.30 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2016 | 1.44x | $68.30 Million | $98.10 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2015 | 0.90x | $115.10 Million | $103.90 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2014 | 1.10x | $84.00 Million | $92.60 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2013 | 0.93x | $96.30 Million | $89.50 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2012 | 1.03x | $66.70 Million | $68.50 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2011 | 1.24x | $45.90 Million | $57.10 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2010 | 1.92x | $25.90 Million | $49.60 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2009 | 1.15x | $50.90 Million | $58.70 Million | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2008 | 0.60x | $47.30 Million | $28.30 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2007 | 1.21x | $26.80 Million | $32.50 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2006 | 1.65x | $20.37 Million | $33.64 Million | ▲ +63.2% |
| 2005 | 1.01x | $24.08 Million | $24.37 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2004 | 0.75x | $30.65 Million | $22.92 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2003 | 1.40x | $15.62 Million | $21.94 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2002 | 2.18x | $9.57 Million | $20.82 Million | ▲ +154.0% |
| 2001 | 0.86x | $23.21 Million | $19.89 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2000 | 2.09x | $8.86 Million | $18.56 Million | ▲ +148.8% |
| 1999 | 0.84x | $18.30 Million | $15.40 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1998 | 1.10x | $13.20 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 1997 | 0.86x | $16.20 Million | $13.90 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 1996 | 3.13x | $6.20 Million | $19.40 Million | ▲ +264.3% |
| 1995 | 0.86x | $17.00 Million | $14.60 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 1994 | 0.56x | $16.30 Million | $9.20 Million | — |