Artesian Resources Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index
Artesian Resources Corporation cash flow quality index. Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.55x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $10.18 Million exceeds net income of $6.58 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See ARTNA financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Artesian Resources Corporation (1995–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Artesian Resources Corporation from 1995 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Artesian Resources Corporation across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) cash flow to debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Artesian Resources Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1995–2025)
Artesian Resources Corporation cash flow quality index by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Artesian Resources Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ARTNA cash generation efficiency.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.77x | $40.35 Million | $22.82 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2024 | 1.81x | $36.82 Million | $20.39 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2023 | 1.91x | $31.85 Million | $16.70 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2022 | 1.35x | $24.27 Million | $18.00 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2021 | 1.86x | $31.31 Million | $16.83 Million | ▲ +53.7% |
| 2020 | 1.21x | $20.36 Million | $16.82 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2019 | 1.26x | $18.87 Million | $14.93 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2018 | 2.04x | $29.14 Million | $14.28 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2017 | 2.56x | $35.78 Million | $13.98 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2016 | 2.30x | $29.78 Million | $12.95 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2015 | 2.50x | $28.29 Million | $11.30 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2014 | 1.93x | $18.35 Million | $9.51 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2013 | 2.53x | $21.02 Million | $8.30 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2012 | 2.37x | $23.37 Million | $9.85 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2011 | 2.85x | $19.22 Million | $6.75 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2010 | 2.38x | $18.11 Million | $7.62 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2009 | 1.84x | $13.38 Million | $7.26 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2008 | 2.83x | $18.18 Million | $6.42 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2007 | 1.86x | $11.63 Million | $6.26 Million | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2006 | 2.10x | $12.72 Million | $6.07 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2005 | 2.76x | $13.87 Million | $5.04 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2004 | 2.60x | $11.43 Million | $4.40 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2003 | 3.60x | $14.11 Million | $3.92 Million | ▲ +444.9% |
| 2002 | 0.66x | $2.75 Million | $4.17 Million | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2001 | 2.68x | $8.89 Million | $3.32 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2000 | 1.61x | $3.95 Million | $2.45 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 1999 | 2.50x | $7.50 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 1998 | 2.74x | $7.40 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +33.7% |
| 1997 | 2.05x | $4.10 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 1996 | 2.53x | $4.30 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 1995 | 2.58x | $3.10 Million | $1.20 Million | — |