Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.46 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($601.31 Million) in one year. See ARTNA free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Artesian Resources Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Artesian Resources Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Artesian Resources Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Artesian Resources Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ARTNA market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $40.35 Million | $601.31 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $36.82 Million | $559.43 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $31.85 Million | $536.43 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $24.27 Million | $532.37 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $31.31 Million | $447.30 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $20.36 Million | $423.79 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $18.87 Million | $400.82 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $29.14 Million | $376.58 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $35.78 Million | $348.00 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $29.78 Million | $311.95 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $28.29 Million | $299.30 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $18.35 Million | $296.61 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $21.02 Million | $282.00 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $23.37 Million | $273.53 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $19.22 Million | $265.74 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $18.11 Million | $276.38 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $13.38 Million | $267.72 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $18.18 Million | $260.91 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $11.63 Million | $209.46 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $12.72 Million | $207.56 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $13.87 Million | $186.04 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $11.43 Million | $172.44 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $14.11 Million | $163.63 Million | ▲ +312.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $2.75 Million | $131.80 Million | ▼ -69.7% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $8.89 Million | $128.89 Million | ▲ +94.3% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $3.95 Million | $111.28 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $7.50 Million | $99.70 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $7.40 Million | $91.00 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $4.10 Million | $80.70 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | $4.30 Million | $73.10 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 1995 | 0.04x | $3.10 Million | $80.20 Million | — |