Artesian Resources Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Artesian Resources Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($627.78 Million) in one year. Check ARTNA cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Artesian Resources Corporation (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Artesian Resources Corporation from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Artesian Resources Corporation across 31 annual periods. Check ARTNA capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Artesian Resources Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Artesian Resources Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Artesian Resources Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ARTNA cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $40.35 Million | $601.31 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $36.82 Million | $559.43 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $31.85 Million | $536.43 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $24.27 Million | $532.37 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $31.31 Million | $447.30 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $20.36 Million | $423.79 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $18.87 Million | $400.82 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $29.14 Million | $376.58 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $35.78 Million | $348.00 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $29.78 Million | $311.95 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $28.29 Million | $299.30 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $18.35 Million | $296.61 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $21.02 Million | $282.00 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $23.37 Million | $273.53 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $19.22 Million | $265.74 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $18.11 Million | $276.38 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $13.38 Million | $267.72 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $18.18 Million | $260.91 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $11.63 Million | $209.46 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $12.72 Million | $207.56 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $13.87 Million | $186.04 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $11.43 Million | $172.44 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $14.11 Million | $163.63 Million | ▲ +312.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $2.75 Million | $131.80 Million | ▼ -69.7% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $8.89 Million | $128.89 Million | ▲ +94.3% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $3.95 Million | $111.28 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $7.50 Million | $99.70 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $7.40 Million | $91.00 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $4.10 Million | $80.70 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | $4.30 Million | $73.10 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 1995 | 0.04x | $3.10 Million | $80.20 Million | — |