Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.46 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($601.31 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Artesian Resources Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Artesian Resources Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Artesian Resources Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore Artesian Resources Corporation asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Artesian Resources Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Artesian Resources Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Artesian Resources Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $40.35 Million | $601.31 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $36.82 Million | $559.43 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $31.85 Million | $536.43 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $24.27 Million | $532.37 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $31.31 Million | $447.30 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $20.36 Million | $423.79 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $18.87 Million | $400.82 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $29.14 Million | $376.58 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $35.78 Million | $348.00 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $29.78 Million | $311.95 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $28.29 Million | $299.30 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $18.35 Million | $296.61 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $21.02 Million | $282.00 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $23.37 Million | $273.53 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | $19.22 Million | $265.74 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $18.11 Million | $276.38 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $13.38 Million | $267.72 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $18.18 Million | $260.91 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $11.63 Million | $209.46 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $12.72 Million | $207.56 Million | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $13.87 Million | $186.04 Million | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $11.43 Million | $172.44 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $14.11 Million | $163.63 Million | ▲ +312.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $2.75 Million | $131.80 Million | ▼ -69.7% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $8.89 Million | $128.89 Million | ▲ +94.3% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $3.95 Million | $111.28 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $7.50 Million | $99.70 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $7.40 Million | $91.00 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $4.10 Million | $80.70 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | $4.30 Million | $73.10 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 1995 | 0.04x | $3.10 Million | $80.20 Million | — |