Lionheart Holdings (CUB) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Lionheart Holdings (CUB) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -0.05x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $-105.92K is below net income of $2.17 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore CUB cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Lionheart Holdings Cash Flow Quality Index (1989–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Lionheart Holdings across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check how aggressively does Lionheart Holdings reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Lionheart Holdings (1989–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Lionheart Holdings. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see CUB stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.07x | $-585.48K | $8.95 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2024 | -0.11x | $-641.11K | $5.84 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2019 | -0.64x | $-31.85 Million | $49.69 Million | ▼ -141.6% |
| 2018 | 1.54x | $18.96 Million | $12.31 Million | ▼ -94.0% |
| 2016 | 25.71x | $44.60 Million | $1.74 Million | ▲ +555.9% |
| 2015 | 3.92x | $89.69 Million | $22.89 Million | ▲ +137.2% |
| 2014 | 1.65x | $114.81 Million | $69.49 Million | ▲ +346.4% |
| 2013 | -0.67x | $-13.28 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2012 | -0.59x | $-54.68 Million | $91.90 Million | ▼ -138.0% |
| 2011 | 1.56x | $132.59 Million | $84.77 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2010 | 1.58x | $111.72 Million | $70.64 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2009 | 3.16x | $176.03 Million | $55.69 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2008 | 2.51x | $92.66 Million | $36.85 Million | ▲ +51.2% |
| 2007 | 1.66x | $69.16 Million | $41.59 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2006 | 1.30x | $31.35 Million | $24.13 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 2005 | 4.71x | $54.71 Million | $11.63 Million | ▲ +716.2% |
| 2004 | -0.76x | $-28.19 Million | $36.91 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2003 | -0.72x | $-26.12 Million | $36.52 Million | ▼ -220.4% |
| 2002 | 0.59x | $17.48 Million | $29.44 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2001 | 0.52x | $10.76 Million | $20.84 Million | ▼ -99.1% |
| 2000 | 57.33x | $38.64 Million | $674.00K | ▲ +1527.9% |
| 1999 | 3.52x | $49.30 Million | $14.00 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 1998 | -56.89x | $-51.20 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -3254.7% |
| 1997 | 1.80x | $22.00 Million | $12.20 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 1996 | 3.19x | $35.40 Million | $11.10 Million | ▲ +212.6% |
| 1995 | -2.83x | $-15.30 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -154.6% |
| 1994 | 5.19x | $19.20 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +612.0% |
| 1993 | -1.01x | $-22.60 Million | $22.30 Million | ▼ -291.7% |
| 1992 | 0.53x | $3.70 Million | $7.00 Million | ▼ -82.9% |
| 1991 | 3.09x | $43.20 Million | $14.00 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 1990 | 1.78x | $41.00 Million | $23.00 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 1989 | 1.82x | $38.30 Million | $21.10 Million | — |