Lionheart Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lionheart Holdings cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lionheart Holdings (CUB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-105.92K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.11 Million) in one year. Check Lionheart Holdings cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lionheart Holdings (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lionheart Holdings from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lionheart Holdings across 34 annual periods. Check Lionheart Holdings (CUB) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lionheart Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Lionheart Holdings cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lionheart Holdings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lionheart Holdings operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-585.48K | $10.11 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-641.11K | $10.01 Million | ▼ -1656.5% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-4.87 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +90.1% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | $-31.85 Million | $866.60 Million | ▼ -212.5% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $18.96 Million | $580.69 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $24.74 Million | $646.65 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $44.60 Million | $814.78 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $89.69 Million | $543.99 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $114.81 Million | $412.11 Million | ▲ +943.6% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | $-13.28 Million | $402.03 Million | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2012 | -0.15x | $-54.68 Million | $355.98 Million | ▼ -147.2% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | $132.59 Million | $407.04 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | $111.72 Million | $368.33 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2009 | 0.52x | $176.03 Million | $335.47 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2008 | 0.37x | $92.66 Million | $252.40 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $69.16 Million | $209.79 Million | ▲ +136.0% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $31.35 Million | $224.48 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $54.71 Million | $249.77 Million | ▲ +289.7% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-28.19 Million | $244.16 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | $-26.12 Million | $204.93 Million | ▼ -217.6% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $17.48 Million | $161.30 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $10.76 Million | $150.45 Million | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | $38.64 Million | $146.33 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 1999 | 0.33x | $49.30 Million | $147.20 Million | ▲ +178.8% |
| 1998 | -0.43x | $-51.20 Million | $120.40 Million | ▼ -306.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $22.00 Million | $107.00 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1996 | 0.36x | $35.40 Million | $98.90 Million | ▲ +411.8% |
| 1995 | -0.11x | $-15.30 Million | $133.30 Million | ▼ -175.2% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $19.20 Million | $125.80 Million | ▲ +170.9% |
| 1993 | -0.22x | $-22.60 Million | $105.00 Million | ▼ -703.8% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $3.70 Million | $103.80 Million | ▼ -90.2% |
| 1991 | 0.36x | $43.20 Million | $118.40 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 1990 | 0.31x | $41.00 Million | $130.80 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $38.30 Million | $145.60 Million | — |