Lionheart Holdings (CUB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lionheart Holdings (CUB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-105.92K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.11 Million) in one year. See CUB financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lionheart Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lionheart Holdings across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Lionheart Holdings generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lionheart Holdings (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lionheart Holdings. Check Lionheart Holdings (CUB) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-585.48K | $10.11 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-641.11K | $10.01 Million | ▼ -1656.5% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-4.87 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +90.1% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | $-31.85 Million | $866.60 Million | ▼ -212.5% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $18.96 Million | $580.69 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $24.74 Million | $646.65 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $44.60 Million | $814.78 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $89.69 Million | $543.99 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $114.81 Million | $412.11 Million | ▲ +943.6% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | $-13.28 Million | $402.03 Million | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2012 | -0.15x | $-54.68 Million | $355.98 Million | ▼ -147.2% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | $132.59 Million | $407.04 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | $111.72 Million | $368.33 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2009 | 0.52x | $176.03 Million | $335.47 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2008 | 0.37x | $92.66 Million | $252.40 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $69.16 Million | $209.79 Million | ▲ +136.0% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $31.35 Million | $224.48 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $54.71 Million | $249.77 Million | ▲ +289.7% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-28.19 Million | $244.16 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | $-26.12 Million | $204.93 Million | ▼ -217.6% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $17.48 Million | $161.30 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $10.76 Million | $150.45 Million | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | $38.64 Million | $146.33 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 1999 | 0.33x | $49.30 Million | $147.20 Million | ▲ +178.8% |
| 1998 | -0.43x | $-51.20 Million | $120.40 Million | ▼ -306.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $22.00 Million | $107.00 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1996 | 0.36x | $35.40 Million | $98.90 Million | ▲ +411.8% |
| 1995 | -0.11x | $-15.30 Million | $133.30 Million | ▼ -175.2% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $19.20 Million | $125.80 Million | ▲ +170.9% |
| 1993 | -0.22x | $-22.60 Million | $105.00 Million | ▼ -703.8% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $3.70 Million | $103.80 Million | ▼ -90.2% |
| 1991 | 0.36x | $43.20 Million | $118.40 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 1990 | 0.31x | $41.00 Million | $130.80 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $38.30 Million | $145.60 Million | — |