Lionheart Holdings (CUB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lionheart Holdings (CUB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-105.92K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.11 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Lionheart Holdings to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lionheart Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lionheart Holdings across 34 annual periods. Also explore CUB net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lionheart Holdings (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lionheart Holdings. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Lionheart Holdings.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-585.48K | $10.11 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | $-641.11K | $10.01 Million | ▼ -1656.5% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-4.87 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +90.1% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | $-31.85 Million | $866.60 Million | ▼ -212.5% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $18.96 Million | $580.69 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $24.74 Million | $646.65 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $44.60 Million | $814.78 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $89.69 Million | $543.99 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $114.81 Million | $412.11 Million | ▲ +943.6% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | $-13.28 Million | $402.03 Million | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2012 | -0.15x | $-54.68 Million | $355.98 Million | ▼ -147.2% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | $132.59 Million | $407.04 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | $111.72 Million | $368.33 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2009 | 0.52x | $176.03 Million | $335.47 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2008 | 0.37x | $92.66 Million | $252.40 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $69.16 Million | $209.79 Million | ▲ +136.0% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $31.35 Million | $224.48 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $54.71 Million | $249.77 Million | ▲ +289.7% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-28.19 Million | $244.16 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2003 | -0.13x | $-26.12 Million | $204.93 Million | ▼ -217.6% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $17.48 Million | $161.30 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $10.76 Million | $150.45 Million | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | $38.64 Million | $146.33 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 1999 | 0.33x | $49.30 Million | $147.20 Million | ▲ +178.8% |
| 1998 | -0.43x | $-51.20 Million | $120.40 Million | ▼ -306.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $22.00 Million | $107.00 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1996 | 0.36x | $35.40 Million | $98.90 Million | ▲ +411.8% |
| 1995 | -0.11x | $-15.30 Million | $133.30 Million | ▼ -175.2% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $19.20 Million | $125.80 Million | ▲ +170.9% |
| 1993 | -0.22x | $-22.60 Million | $105.00 Million | ▼ -703.8% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $3.70 Million | $103.80 Million | ▼ -90.2% |
| 1991 | 0.36x | $43.20 Million | $118.40 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 1990 | 0.31x | $41.00 Million | $130.80 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $38.30 Million | $145.60 Million | — |