Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.35x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $6.83 Million exceeds net income of $5.07 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Landmark Bancorp Inc cash conversion from operations to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1994–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Landmark Bancorp Inc across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check LARK total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Landmark Bancorp Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Landmark Bancorp Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.15x | $21.63 Million | $18.77 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2024 | 1.09x | $14.24 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2023 | 1.03x | $12.60 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2022 | 2.51x | $24.78 Million | $9.88 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2021 | 1.73x | $31.16 Million | $18.01 Million | ▲ +127.6% |
| 2020 | 0.76x | $14.81 Million | $19.49 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $9.28 Million | $10.66 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2018 | 2.05x | $21.38 Million | $10.43 Million | ▲ +193.2% |
| 2017 | 0.70x | $3.06 Million | $4.37 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2016 | 2.12x | $19.02 Million | $8.96 Million | ▲ +216.8% |
| 2015 | 0.67x | $7.04 Million | $10.51 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2014 | 1.08x | $8.67 Million | $8.05 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2013 | 2.60x | $12.10 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2012 | 1.95x | $12.38 Million | $6.37 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2011 | 2.91x | $13.07 Million | $4.48 Million | ▲ +389.2% |
| 2010 | -1.01x | $-2.06 Million | $2.04 Million | ▼ -181.8% |
| 2009 | 1.23x | $4.03 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2008 | 1.17x | $5.33 Million | $4.55 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2007 | 1.44x | $7.77 Million | $5.40 Million | ▲ +633.5% |
| 2006 | -0.27x | $-1.62 Million | $6.01 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | 1.49x | $5.82 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2004 | 1.11x | $4.74 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2003 | 1.18x | $5.72 Million | $4.85 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2002 | 1.99x | $9.11 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2001 | 3.96x | $9.86 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +466.1% |
| 2000 | 0.70x | $1.67 Million | $2.38 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 1999 | 2.46x | $5.90 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 1998 | 1.38x | $3.30 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1997 | 3.88x | $9.70 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +262.1% |
| 1996 | 1.07x | $1.50 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 1995 | 1.89x | $3.40 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 1994 | 5.00x | $8.00 Million | $1.60 Million | — |