Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow Quality Index
Landmark Bancorp Inc cash flow quality index. Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.63x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $3.41 Million is below net income of $5.39 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. See LARK free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Landmark Bancorp Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Landmark Bancorp Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Landmark Bancorp Inc across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore Landmark Bancorp Inc cash debt coverage ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1994–2025)
Landmark Bancorp Inc cash flow quality index by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Landmark Bancorp Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LARK cash flow metrics.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.15x | $21.63 Million | $18.77 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2024 | 1.09x | $14.24 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2023 | 1.03x | $12.60 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2022 | 2.51x | $24.78 Million | $9.88 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2021 | 1.73x | $31.16 Million | $18.01 Million | ▲ +127.6% |
| 2020 | 0.76x | $14.81 Million | $19.49 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $9.28 Million | $10.66 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2018 | 2.05x | $21.38 Million | $10.43 Million | ▲ +193.2% |
| 2017 | 0.70x | $3.06 Million | $4.37 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2016 | 2.12x | $19.02 Million | $8.96 Million | ▲ +216.8% |
| 2015 | 0.67x | $7.04 Million | $10.51 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2014 | 1.08x | $8.67 Million | $8.05 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2013 | 2.60x | $12.10 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2012 | 1.95x | $12.38 Million | $6.37 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2011 | 2.91x | $13.07 Million | $4.48 Million | ▲ +389.2% |
| 2010 | -1.01x | $-2.06 Million | $2.04 Million | ▼ -181.8% |
| 2009 | 1.23x | $4.03 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2008 | 1.17x | $5.33 Million | $4.55 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2007 | 1.44x | $7.77 Million | $5.40 Million | ▲ +633.5% |
| 2006 | -0.27x | $-1.62 Million | $6.01 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | 1.49x | $5.82 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2004 | 1.11x | $4.74 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2003 | 1.18x | $5.72 Million | $4.85 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2002 | 1.99x | $9.11 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2001 | 3.96x | $9.86 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +466.1% |
| 2000 | 0.70x | $1.67 Million | $2.38 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 1999 | 2.46x | $5.90 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 1998 | 1.38x | $3.30 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1997 | 3.88x | $9.70 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +262.1% |
| 1996 | 1.07x | $1.50 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 1995 | 1.89x | $3.40 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 1994 | 5.00x | $8.00 Million | $1.60 Million | — |