Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.35x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $6.83 Million exceeds net income of $5.07 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore how much of Landmark Bancorp Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1994–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Landmark Bancorp Inc across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check how tangible is Landmark Bancorp Inc's equity to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Landmark Bancorp Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Landmark Bancorp Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see LARK market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.15x | $21.63 Million | $18.77 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2024 | 1.09x | $14.24 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2023 | 1.03x | $12.60 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2022 | 2.51x | $24.78 Million | $9.88 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2021 | 1.73x | $31.16 Million | $18.01 Million | ▲ +127.6% |
| 2020 | 0.76x | $14.81 Million | $19.49 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2019 | 0.87x | $9.28 Million | $10.66 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2018 | 2.05x | $21.38 Million | $10.43 Million | ▲ +193.2% |
| 2017 | 0.70x | $3.06 Million | $4.37 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2016 | 2.12x | $19.02 Million | $8.96 Million | ▲ +216.8% |
| 2015 | 0.67x | $7.04 Million | $10.51 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2014 | 1.08x | $8.67 Million | $8.05 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2013 | 2.60x | $12.10 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2012 | 1.95x | $12.38 Million | $6.37 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2011 | 2.91x | $13.07 Million | $4.48 Million | ▲ +389.2% |
| 2010 | -1.01x | $-2.06 Million | $2.04 Million | ▼ -181.8% |
| 2009 | 1.23x | $4.03 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2008 | 1.17x | $5.33 Million | $4.55 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2007 | 1.44x | $7.77 Million | $5.40 Million | ▲ +633.5% |
| 2006 | -0.27x | $-1.62 Million | $6.01 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2005 | 1.49x | $5.82 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2004 | 1.11x | $4.74 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2003 | 1.18x | $5.72 Million | $4.85 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2002 | 1.99x | $9.11 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2001 | 3.96x | $9.86 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +466.1% |
| 2000 | 0.70x | $1.67 Million | $2.38 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 1999 | 2.46x | $5.90 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 1998 | 1.38x | $3.30 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1997 | 3.88x | $9.70 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +262.1% |
| 1996 | 1.07x | $1.50 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 1995 | 1.89x | $3.40 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 1994 | 5.00x | $8.00 Million | $1.60 Million | — |