Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Landmark Bancorp Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.44 Billion) in one year. Check Landmark Bancorp Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Landmark Bancorp Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Landmark Bancorp Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Landmark Bancorp Inc across 32 annual periods. Check LARK total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Landmark Bancorp Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Landmark Bancorp Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LARK operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $21.63 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $14.24 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $12.60 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $24.78 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $31.16 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $14.81 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $9.28 Million | $889.86 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $21.38 Million | $893.88 Million | ▲ +559.0% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $3.06 Million | $841.83 Million | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $19.02 Million | $826.43 Million | ▲ +160.8% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $7.04 Million | $797.81 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $8.67 Million | $791.83 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $12.10 Million | $765.61 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $12.38 Million | $550.73 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $13.07 Million | $539.12 Million | ▲ +697.8% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | $-2.06 Million | $507.69 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.03 Million | $530.27 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $5.33 Million | $550.81 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $7.77 Million | $554.16 Million | ▲ +568.5% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-1.62 Million | $541.33 Million | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $5.82 Million | $421.04 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $4.74 Million | $399.92 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $5.72 Million | $291.47 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $9.11 Million | $300.24 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $9.86 Million | $309.49 Million | ▲ +291.9% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.67 Million | $205.07 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $5.90 Million | $222.80 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $3.30 Million | $200.40 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $9.70 Million | $195.70 Million | ▲ +499.1% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $1.50 Million | $181.30 Million | ▼ -57.7% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $3.40 Million | $173.90 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $8.00 Million | $152.10 Million | — |