Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.44 Billion) in one year. See LARK FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Landmark Bancorp Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Landmark Bancorp Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Landmark Bancorp Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Landmark Bancorp Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Landmark Bancorp Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $21.63 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $14.24 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $12.60 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $24.78 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $31.16 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $14.81 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $9.28 Million | $889.86 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $21.38 Million | $893.88 Million | ▲ +559.0% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $3.06 Million | $841.83 Million | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $19.02 Million | $826.43 Million | ▲ +160.8% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $7.04 Million | $797.81 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $8.67 Million | $791.83 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $12.10 Million | $765.61 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $12.38 Million | $550.73 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $13.07 Million | $539.12 Million | ▲ +697.8% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | $-2.06 Million | $507.69 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.03 Million | $530.27 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $5.33 Million | $550.81 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $7.77 Million | $554.16 Million | ▲ +568.5% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-1.62 Million | $541.33 Million | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $5.82 Million | $421.04 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $4.74 Million | $399.92 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $5.72 Million | $291.47 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $9.11 Million | $300.24 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $9.86 Million | $309.49 Million | ▲ +291.9% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.67 Million | $205.07 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $5.90 Million | $222.80 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $3.30 Million | $200.40 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $9.70 Million | $195.70 Million | ▲ +499.1% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $1.50 Million | $181.30 Million | ▼ -57.7% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $3.40 Million | $173.90 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $8.00 Million | $152.10 Million | — |