Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.44 Billion) in one year. Explore LARK long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Landmark Bancorp Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore LARK asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Landmark Bancorp Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Landmark Bancorp Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $21.63 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $14.24 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $12.60 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $24.78 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $31.16 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $14.81 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $9.28 Million | $889.86 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $21.38 Million | $893.88 Million | ▲ +559.0% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $3.06 Million | $841.83 Million | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $19.02 Million | $826.43 Million | ▲ +160.8% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $7.04 Million | $797.81 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $8.67 Million | $791.83 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $12.10 Million | $765.61 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $12.38 Million | $550.73 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $13.07 Million | $539.12 Million | ▲ +697.8% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | $-2.06 Million | $507.69 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.03 Million | $530.27 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $5.33 Million | $550.81 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $7.77 Million | $554.16 Million | ▲ +568.5% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-1.62 Million | $541.33 Million | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $5.82 Million | $421.04 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $4.74 Million | $399.92 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $5.72 Million | $291.47 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $9.11 Million | $300.24 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $9.86 Million | $309.49 Million | ▲ +291.9% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.67 Million | $205.07 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $5.90 Million | $222.80 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $3.30 Million | $200.40 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $9.70 Million | $195.70 Million | ▲ +499.1% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $1.50 Million | $181.30 Million | ▼ -57.7% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $3.40 Million | $173.90 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $8.00 Million | $152.10 Million | — |