Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.44 Billion) in one year. See Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Landmark Bancorp Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Landmark Bancorp Inc across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LARK cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Landmark Bancorp Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Landmark Bancorp Inc. Check Landmark Bancorp Inc (LARK) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $21.63 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $14.24 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $12.60 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $24.78 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $31.16 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $14.81 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $9.28 Million | $889.86 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $21.38 Million | $893.88 Million | ▲ +559.0% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $3.06 Million | $841.83 Million | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $19.02 Million | $826.43 Million | ▲ +160.8% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $7.04 Million | $797.81 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $8.67 Million | $791.83 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $12.10 Million | $765.61 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $12.38 Million | $550.73 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $13.07 Million | $539.12 Million | ▲ +697.8% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | $-2.06 Million | $507.69 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.03 Million | $530.27 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $5.33 Million | $550.81 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $7.77 Million | $554.16 Million | ▲ +568.5% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-1.62 Million | $541.33 Million | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $5.82 Million | $421.04 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $4.74 Million | $399.92 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $5.72 Million | $291.47 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $9.11 Million | $300.24 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $9.86 Million | $309.49 Million | ▲ +291.9% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.67 Million | $205.07 Million | ▼ -69.3% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $5.90 Million | $222.80 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $3.30 Million | $200.40 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $9.70 Million | $195.70 Million | ▲ +499.1% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $1.50 Million | $181.30 Million | ▼ -57.7% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $3.40 Million | $173.90 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $8.00 Million | $152.10 Million | — |