Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 3.10x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $4.22 Million exceeds net income of $1.36 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) debt coverage ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1992–2023)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (1992–2023)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1081.90x | $12.49 Billion | $11.55 Million | ▲ +108089.5% |
| 2022 | 1.00x | $11.74 Million | $11.74 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2021 | 1.28x | $8.51 Million | $6.67 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2020 | -319.16x | $-364.72 Million | $1.14 Million | ▼ -34394.9% |
| 2019 | 0.93x | $4.89 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2018 | 0.91x | $7.77 Million | $8.56 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.90x | $5.46 Million | $6.05 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2016 | 0.90x | $5.73 Million | $6.36 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2015 | 0.94x | $7.68 Million | $8.13 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0.95x | $15.15 Million | $15.95 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2013 | 0.95x | $13.15 Million | $13.89 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.94x | $14.01 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2011 | 0.94x | $16.85 Million | $17.96 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2010 | 0.90x | $15.06 Million | $16.73 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2009 | 0.91x | $10.25 Million | $11.32 Million | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2008 | 0.96x | $29.81 Million | $30.94 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2007 | 0.93x | $18.51 Million | $19.81 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2005 | 1.00x | $20.31 Million | $20.27 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2004 | 1.00x | $14.85 Million | $14.92 Million | ▲ +209.7% |
| 2003 | -0.91x | $-11.51 Million | $12.69 Million | ▼ -186.8% |
| 2002 | 1.04x | $9.22 Million | $8.82 Million | ▲ +203.6% |
| 2001 | -1.01x | $-14.33 Million | $14.21 Million | ▼ -199.6% |
| 2000 | 1.01x | $11.64 Million | $11.50 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 1.06x | $6.93 Million | $6.55 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 1998 | 0.98x | $6.79 Million | $6.93 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1997 | 0.93x | $9.69 Million | $10.41 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 1996 | 1.11x | $9.00 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 1995 | 0.93x | $5.20 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -12.4% |
| 1994 | 1.06x | $7.10 Million | $6.70 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 1993 | 1.00x | $7.70 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.00x | $7.30 Million | $7.30 Million | — |