Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.94x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $4.22 Million is below net income of $4.49 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore Cross Timbers Royalty Trust strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1992–2023)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Cross Timbers Royalty Trust tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (1992–2023)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see CRT stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1081.90x | $12.49 Billion | $11.55 Million | ▲ +108089.5% |
| 2022 | 1.00x | $11.74 Million | $11.74 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2021 | 1.28x | $8.51 Million | $6.67 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2020 | -319.16x | $-364.72 Million | $1.14 Million | ▼ -34394.9% |
| 2019 | 0.93x | $4.89 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2018 | 0.91x | $7.77 Million | $8.56 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.90x | $5.46 Million | $6.05 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2016 | 0.90x | $5.73 Million | $6.36 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2015 | 0.94x | $7.68 Million | $8.13 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0.95x | $15.15 Million | $15.95 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2013 | 0.95x | $13.15 Million | $13.89 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.94x | $14.01 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2011 | 0.94x | $16.85 Million | $17.96 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2010 | 0.90x | $15.06 Million | $16.73 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2009 | 0.91x | $10.25 Million | $11.32 Million | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2008 | 0.96x | $29.81 Million | $30.94 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2007 | 0.93x | $18.51 Million | $19.81 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2005 | 1.00x | $20.31 Million | $20.27 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2004 | 1.00x | $14.85 Million | $14.92 Million | ▲ +209.7% |
| 2003 | -0.91x | $-11.51 Million | $12.69 Million | ▼ -186.8% |
| 2002 | 1.04x | $9.22 Million | $8.82 Million | ▲ +203.6% |
| 2001 | -1.01x | $-14.33 Million | $14.21 Million | ▼ -199.6% |
| 2000 | 1.01x | $11.64 Million | $11.50 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 1.06x | $6.93 Million | $6.55 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 1998 | 0.98x | $6.79 Million | $6.93 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1997 | 0.93x | $9.69 Million | $10.41 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 1996 | 1.11x | $9.00 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 1995 | 0.93x | $5.20 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -12.4% |
| 1994 | 1.06x | $7.10 Million | $6.70 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 1993 | 1.00x | $7.70 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.00x | $7.30 Million | $7.30 Million | — |