Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 3.10x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $4.22 Million exceeds net income of $1.36 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Cross Timbers Royalty Trust cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1992–2023)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Cross Timbers Royalty Trust total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (1992–2023)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see CRT stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1081.90x | $12.49 Billion | $11.55 Million | ▲ +108089.5% |
| 2022 | 1.00x | $11.74 Million | $11.74 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2021 | 1.28x | $8.51 Million | $6.67 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2020 | -319.16x | $-364.72 Million | $1.14 Million | ▼ -34394.9% |
| 2019 | 0.93x | $4.89 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2018 | 0.91x | $7.77 Million | $8.56 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.90x | $5.46 Million | $6.05 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2016 | 0.90x | $5.73 Million | $6.36 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2015 | 0.94x | $7.68 Million | $8.13 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0.95x | $15.15 Million | $15.95 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2013 | 0.95x | $13.15 Million | $13.89 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.94x | $14.01 Million | $14.89 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2011 | 0.94x | $16.85 Million | $17.96 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2010 | 0.90x | $15.06 Million | $16.73 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2009 | 0.91x | $10.25 Million | $11.32 Million | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2008 | 0.96x | $29.81 Million | $30.94 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2007 | 0.93x | $18.51 Million | $19.81 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2005 | 1.00x | $20.31 Million | $20.27 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2004 | 1.00x | $14.85 Million | $14.92 Million | ▲ +209.7% |
| 2003 | -0.91x | $-11.51 Million | $12.69 Million | ▼ -186.8% |
| 2002 | 1.04x | $9.22 Million | $8.82 Million | ▲ +203.6% |
| 2001 | -1.01x | $-14.33 Million | $14.21 Million | ▼ -199.6% |
| 2000 | 1.01x | $11.64 Million | $11.50 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 1.06x | $6.93 Million | $6.55 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 1998 | 0.98x | $6.79 Million | $6.93 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1997 | 0.93x | $9.69 Million | $10.41 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 1996 | 1.11x | $9.00 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 1995 | 0.93x | $5.20 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -12.4% |
| 1994 | 1.06x | $7.10 Million | $6.70 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 1993 | 1.00x | $7.70 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.00x | $7.30 Million | $7.30 Million | — |