Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.97x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.22 Million could theoretically repay 2% of its total liabilities ($2.14 Million) in one year. See Cross Timbers Royalty Trust leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. Check Cross Timbers Royalty Trust earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.97x | $4.22 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2024 | 3.96x | $5.44 Million | $1.37 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2023 | 6726.53x | $12.49 Billion | $1.86 Million | ▲ +108847.1% |
| 2022 | 6.17x | $11.74 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2021 | 4.67x | $8.51 Million | $1.82 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 2020 | -265.67x | $-364.72 Million | $1.37 Million | ▼ -8262.0% |
| 2019 | 3.25x | $4.89 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2018 | 4.85x | $7.77 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2017 | 3.71x | $5.46 Million | $1.47 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2016 | 3.71x | $5.73 Million | $1.54 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2015 | 7.92x | $7.68 Million | $969.70K | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2014 | 11.85x | $15.15 Million | $1.28 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2013 | 11.50x | $13.15 Million | $1.14 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2012 | 10.71x | $14.01 Million | $1.31 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2011 | 13.89x | $16.85 Million | $1.21 Million | ▲ +30.4% |
| 2010 | 10.65x | $15.06 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2009 | 9.60x | $10.25 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2008 | 19.67x | $29.81 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +87.0% |
| 2007 | 10.52x | $18.51 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2005 | 9.61x | $20.31 Million | $2.11 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2004 | 10.34x | $14.85 Million | $1.44 Million | ▲ +189.3% |
| 2003 | -11.57x | $-11.51 Million | $994.75K | ▼ -256.9% |
| 2002 | 7.38x | $9.22 Million | $1.25 Million | ▲ +143.9% |
| 2001 | -16.80x | $-14.33 Million | $852.83K | ▼ -251.8% |
| 2000 | 11.07x | $11.64 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 1999 | 7.59x | $6.93 Million | $914.00K | ▼ -40.9% |
| 1998 | 12.83x | $6.79 Million | $529.54K | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1997 | 14.61x | $9.69 Million | $663.55K | ▲ +127.2% |
| 1996 | 6.43x | $9.00 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1995 | 13.00x | $5.20 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +64.8% |
| 1994 | 7.89x | $7.10 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -48.8% |
| 1993 | 15.40x | $7.70 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +47.7% |
| 1992 | 10.43x | $7.30 Million | $700.00K | — |