Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.97x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.22 Million could theoretically repay 2% of its total liabilities ($2.14 Million) in one year. Check Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust across 33 annual periods. Check Cross Timbers Royalty Trust investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CRT cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.97x | $4.22 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2024 | 3.96x | $5.44 Million | $1.37 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2023 | 6726.53x | $12.49 Billion | $1.86 Million | ▲ +108847.1% |
| 2022 | 6.17x | $11.74 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2021 | 4.67x | $8.51 Million | $1.82 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 2020 | -265.67x | $-364.72 Million | $1.37 Million | ▼ -8262.0% |
| 2019 | 3.25x | $4.89 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2018 | 4.85x | $7.77 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2017 | 3.71x | $5.46 Million | $1.47 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2016 | 3.71x | $5.73 Million | $1.54 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2015 | 7.92x | $7.68 Million | $969.70K | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2014 | 11.85x | $15.15 Million | $1.28 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2013 | 11.50x | $13.15 Million | $1.14 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2012 | 10.71x | $14.01 Million | $1.31 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2011 | 13.89x | $16.85 Million | $1.21 Million | ▲ +30.4% |
| 2010 | 10.65x | $15.06 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2009 | 9.60x | $10.25 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2008 | 19.67x | $29.81 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +87.0% |
| 2007 | 10.52x | $18.51 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2005 | 9.61x | $20.31 Million | $2.11 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2004 | 10.34x | $14.85 Million | $1.44 Million | ▲ +189.3% |
| 2003 | -11.57x | $-11.51 Million | $994.75K | ▼ -256.9% |
| 2002 | 7.38x | $9.22 Million | $1.25 Million | ▲ +143.9% |
| 2001 | -16.80x | $-14.33 Million | $852.83K | ▼ -251.8% |
| 2000 | 11.07x | $11.64 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 1999 | 7.59x | $6.93 Million | $914.00K | ▼ -40.9% |
| 1998 | 12.83x | $6.79 Million | $529.54K | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1997 | 14.61x | $9.69 Million | $663.55K | ▲ +127.2% |
| 1996 | 6.43x | $9.00 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1995 | 13.00x | $5.20 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +64.8% |
| 1994 | 7.89x | $7.10 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -48.8% |
| 1993 | 15.40x | $7.70 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +47.7% |
| 1992 | 10.43x | $7.30 Million | $700.00K | — |