Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 1.97x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.22 Million could theoretically repay 2% of its total liabilities ($2.14 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust across 33 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.97x | $4.22 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2024 | 3.96x | $5.44 Million | $1.37 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2023 | 6726.53x | $12.49 Billion | $1.86 Million | ▲ +108847.1% |
| 2022 | 6.17x | $11.74 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2021 | 4.67x | $8.51 Million | $1.82 Million | ▲ +101.8% |
| 2020 | -265.67x | $-364.72 Million | $1.37 Million | ▼ -8262.0% |
| 2019 | 3.25x | $4.89 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2018 | 4.85x | $7.77 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2017 | 3.71x | $5.46 Million | $1.47 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2016 | 3.71x | $5.73 Million | $1.54 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2015 | 7.92x | $7.68 Million | $969.70K | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2014 | 11.85x | $15.15 Million | $1.28 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2013 | 11.50x | $13.15 Million | $1.14 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2012 | 10.71x | $14.01 Million | $1.31 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2011 | 13.89x | $16.85 Million | $1.21 Million | ▲ +30.4% |
| 2010 | 10.65x | $15.06 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2009 | 9.60x | $10.25 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2008 | 19.67x | $29.81 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +87.0% |
| 2007 | 10.52x | $18.51 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2005 | 9.61x | $20.31 Million | $2.11 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2004 | 10.34x | $14.85 Million | $1.44 Million | ▲ +189.3% |
| 2003 | -11.57x | $-11.51 Million | $994.75K | ▼ -256.9% |
| 2002 | 7.38x | $9.22 Million | $1.25 Million | ▲ +143.9% |
| 2001 | -16.80x | $-14.33 Million | $852.83K | ▼ -251.8% |
| 2000 | 11.07x | $11.64 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 1999 | 7.59x | $6.93 Million | $914.00K | ▼ -40.9% |
| 1998 | 12.83x | $6.79 Million | $529.54K | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1997 | 14.61x | $9.69 Million | $663.55K | ▲ +127.2% |
| 1996 | 6.43x | $9.00 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1995 | 13.00x | $5.20 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +64.8% |
| 1994 | 7.89x | $7.10 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -48.8% |
| 1993 | 15.40x | $7.70 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +47.7% |
| 1992 | 10.43x | $7.30 Million | $700.00K | — |