Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) — Net Asset Quality Index

Latest as of March 2026: 58.5%

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 58.5% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $3.63 Million minus total liabilities of $1.51 Million yields net assets of $2.13 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See CRT defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.

Quality Index

58.5%
Equity / Total Assets

Net Assets

$2.13 Million
USD

Total Assets

$3.63 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$1.51 Million
USD

Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1992–2025)

This chart shows how Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 34 annual periods from 1992 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 58.5%, representing net assets of $2.13 Million against total assets of $3.63 Million USD. Explore Cross Timbers Royalty Trust operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.

Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (1992–2025)

The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust from 1992 to 2025, covering 34 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see CRT market cap.

Year Quality Index Net Assets (USD) Total Assets Total Liabilities Change (pp)
2025 99.9% $2.13 Billion $2.13 Billion $2.14 Million ▲ +36.0 pp
2024 63.9% $2.43 Million $3.81 Million $1.37 Million ▲ +4.9 pp
2023 59.0% $2.67 Million $4.53 Million $1.86 Million ▼ -1.9 pp
2022 60.9% $2.96 Million $4.86 Million $1.90 Million ▼ -3.3 pp
2021 64.2% $3.27 Million $5.09 Million $1.82 Million ▼ -20.4 pp
2020 84.6% $7.52 Million $8.90 Million $1.37 Million ▲ +0.1 pp
2019 84.4% $8.16 Million $9.66 Million $1.50 Million ▲ +0.3 pp
2018 84.2% $8.53 Million $10.13 Million $1.60 Million ▼ -2.2 pp
2017 86.4% $9.31 Million $10.78 Million $1.47 Million ▼ -0.2 pp
2016 86.5% $9.90 Million $11.45 Million $1.54 Million ▼ -5.1 pp
2015 91.6% $10.54 Million $11.51 Million $969.70K ▲ +2.0 pp
2014 89.6% $10.99 Million $12.27 Million $1.28 Million ▼ -1.6 pp
2013 91.2% $11.79 Million $12.94 Million $1.14 Million ▲ +0.6 pp
2012 90.6% $12.53 Million $13.84 Million $1.31 Million ▼ -1.2 pp
2011 91.7% $13.42 Million $14.63 Million $1.21 Million ▲ +0.6 pp
2010 91.1% $14.52 Million $15.94 Million $1.41 Million ▼ -2.7 pp
2009 93.8% $16.19 Million $17.26 Million $1.07 Million ▲ +1.9 pp
2008 91.9% $17.26 Million $18.77 Million $1.52 Million ▲ +0.7 pp
2007 91.3% $18.39 Million $20.15 Million $1.76 Million ▲ +0.4 pp
2006 90.9% $19.68 Million $21.66 Million $1.98 Million ▼ -0.1 pp
2005 90.9% $21.20 Million $23.32 Million $2.11 Million ▼ -3.2 pp
2004 94.1% $22.85 Million $24.28 Million $1.44 Million ▼ -2.0 pp
2003 96.1% $24.67 Million $25.66 Million $994.75K ▲ +0.6 pp
2002 95.5% $26.56 Million $27.81 Million $1.25 Million ▼ -1.6 pp
2001 97.1% $28.90 Million $29.75 Million $852.83K ▲ +0.4 pp
2000 96.7% $30.76 Million $31.81 Million $1.05 Million ▼ -0.6 pp
1999 97.3% $33.01 Million $33.92 Million $914.00K ▼ -1.2 pp
1998 98.6% $36.02 Million $36.55 Million $529.54K ▲ +0.3 pp
1997 98.3% $38.10 Million $38.77 Million $663.55K ▲ +1.6 pp
1996 96.7% $41.30 Million $42.70 Million $1.40 Million ▼ -2.4 pp
1995 99.1% $45.10 Million $45.50 Million $400.00K ▲ +0.9 pp
1994 98.2% $48.70 Million $49.60 Million $900.00K ▼ -0.9 pp
1993 99.0% $52.10 Million $52.60 Million $500.00K ▲ +0.3 pp
1992 98.7% $55.20 Million $55.90 Million $700.00K
pp = percentage points