Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Net Asset Quality Index
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust net asset quality index. Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 58.5% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $3.63 Million minus total liabilities of $1.51 Million yields net assets of $2.13 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Cross Timbers Royalty Trust net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (1992–2025)
Net asset quality index of Cross Timbers Royalty Trust from 1992 to 2025. This chart shows how Cross Timbers Royalty Trust's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 34 annual periods from 1992 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 58.5%, representing net assets of $2.13 Million against total assets of $3.63 Million USD. Check Cross Timbers Royalty Trust strategic capital allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust Net Asset Quality Index by Year (1992–2025)
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust net asset quality index by year from 1992 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Cross Timbers Royalty Trust from 1992 to 2025, covering 34 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Cross Timbers Royalty Trust worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.9% | $2.13 Billion | $2.13 Billion | $2.14 Million | ▲ +36.0 pp |
| 2024 | 63.9% | $2.43 Million | $3.81 Million | $1.37 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2023 | 59.0% | $2.67 Million | $4.53 Million | $1.86 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2022 | 60.9% | $2.96 Million | $4.86 Million | $1.90 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2021 | 64.2% | $3.27 Million | $5.09 Million | $1.82 Million | ▼ -20.4 pp |
| 2020 | 84.6% | $7.52 Million | $8.90 Million | $1.37 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2019 | 84.4% | $8.16 Million | $9.66 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 84.2% | $8.53 Million | $10.13 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2017 | 86.4% | $9.31 Million | $10.78 Million | $1.47 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 86.5% | $9.90 Million | $11.45 Million | $1.54 Million | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2015 | 91.6% | $10.54 Million | $11.51 Million | $969.70K | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 89.6% | $10.99 Million | $12.27 Million | $1.28 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2013 | 91.2% | $11.79 Million | $12.94 Million | $1.14 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2012 | 90.6% | $12.53 Million | $13.84 Million | $1.31 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2011 | 91.7% | $13.42 Million | $14.63 Million | $1.21 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2010 | 91.1% | $14.52 Million | $15.94 Million | $1.41 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2009 | 93.8% | $16.19 Million | $17.26 Million | $1.07 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2008 | 91.9% | $17.26 Million | $18.77 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2007 | 91.3% | $18.39 Million | $20.15 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2006 | 90.9% | $19.68 Million | $21.66 Million | $1.98 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 90.9% | $21.20 Million | $23.32 Million | $2.11 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2004 | 94.1% | $22.85 Million | $24.28 Million | $1.44 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2003 | 96.1% | $24.67 Million | $25.66 Million | $994.75K | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2002 | 95.5% | $26.56 Million | $27.81 Million | $1.25 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2001 | 97.1% | $28.90 Million | $29.75 Million | $852.83K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2000 | 96.7% | $30.76 Million | $31.81 Million | $1.05 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 1999 | 97.3% | $33.01 Million | $33.92 Million | $914.00K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 1998 | 98.6% | $36.02 Million | $36.55 Million | $529.54K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 1997 | 98.3% | $38.10 Million | $38.77 Million | $663.55K | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 1996 | 96.7% | $41.30 Million | $42.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 1995 | 99.1% | $45.10 Million | $45.50 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 1994 | 98.2% | $48.70 Million | $49.60 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 1993 | 99.0% | $52.10 Million | $52.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 1992 | 98.7% | $55.20 Million | $55.90 Million | $700.00K | — |