Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.35x as of May 2026. Operating cash flow of $40.24 Million exceeds net income of $29.80 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore cash flow to debt ratio of Enerpac Tool Group Corp to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Enerpac Tool Group Corp Cash Flow Quality Index (1989–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Enerpac Tool Group Corp across 33 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Enerpac Tool Group Corp operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Enerpac Tool Group Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.20x | $111.28 Million | $92.75 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2024 | 0.99x | $81.32 Million | $82.21 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2023 | 1.45x | $77.60 Million | $53.65 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2022 | 2.64x | $51.74 Million | $19.59 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2021 | 1.35x | $54.18 Million | $40.21 Million | ▲ +337.0% |
| 2020 | -0.57x | $-3.16 Million | $5.56 Million | ▼ -108.5% |
| 2019 | 6.67x | $53.84 Million | $8.07 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 6.49x | $128.97 Million | $19.87 Million | ▲ +747.7% |
| 2014 | 0.77x | $125.23 Million | $163.57 Million | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2013 | 6.45x | $193.79 Million | $30.05 Million | ▲ +208.8% |
| 2012 | 2.09x | $182.33 Million | $87.29 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2011 | 1.54x | $171.57 Million | $111.56 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2010 | 5.04x | $121.09 Million | $24.03 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2009 | 10.69x | $146.72 Million | $13.72 Million | ▲ +670.2% |
| 2008 | 1.39x | $170.10 Million | $122.54 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2007 | 1.69x | $177.11 Million | $104.95 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2006 | 1.32x | $122.16 Million | $92.59 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2005 | 1.36x | $96.99 Million | $71.25 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2004 | 2.01x | $47.96 Million | $23.89 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2003 | 1.71x | $49.42 Million | $28.97 Million | ▲ +44.9% |
| 2002 | 1.18x | $29.74 Million | $25.25 Million | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2001 | 3.91x | $95.14 Million | $24.36 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2000 | 1.73x | $114.73 Million | $66.50 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 1999 | 1.89x | $150.39 Million | $79.40 Million | ▼ -61.0% |
| 1998 | 4.86x | $129.67 Million | $26.69 Million | ▲ +215.1% |
| 1997 | 1.54x | $64.83 Million | $42.04 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 1996 | 0.97x | $32.81 Million | $33.73 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1995 | 1.19x | $23.82 Million | $20.09 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 1994 | 1.33x | $22.48 Million | $16.90 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 1993 | 3.67x | $12.10 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 1991 | 4.24x | $33.10 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +677.3% |
| 1990 | 0.55x | $10.70 Million | $19.60 Million | ▲ +468.9% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $1.90 Million | $19.80 Million | — |