Enerpac Tool Group Corp Cash Flow Quality Index
Enerpac Tool Group Corp cash flow quality index. Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.35x as of May 2026. Operating cash flow of $40.24 Million exceeds net income of $29.80 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See EPAC free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Enerpac Tool Group Corp (1989–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Enerpac Tool Group Corp from 1989 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Enerpac Tool Group Corp across 33 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore how well can Enerpac Tool Group Corp service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Enerpac Tool Group Corp Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1989–2025)
Enerpac Tool Group Corp cash flow quality index by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EPAC operating cash flow.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.20x | $111.28 Million | $92.75 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2024 | 0.99x | $81.32 Million | $82.21 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2023 | 1.45x | $77.60 Million | $53.65 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2022 | 2.64x | $51.74 Million | $19.59 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2021 | 1.35x | $54.18 Million | $40.21 Million | ▲ +337.0% |
| 2020 | -0.57x | $-3.16 Million | $5.56 Million | ▼ -108.5% |
| 2019 | 6.67x | $53.84 Million | $8.07 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 6.49x | $128.97 Million | $19.87 Million | ▲ +747.7% |
| 2014 | 0.77x | $125.23 Million | $163.57 Million | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2013 | 6.45x | $193.79 Million | $30.05 Million | ▲ +208.8% |
| 2012 | 2.09x | $182.33 Million | $87.29 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2011 | 1.54x | $171.57 Million | $111.56 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2010 | 5.04x | $121.09 Million | $24.03 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2009 | 10.69x | $146.72 Million | $13.72 Million | ▲ +670.2% |
| 2008 | 1.39x | $170.10 Million | $122.54 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2007 | 1.69x | $177.11 Million | $104.95 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2006 | 1.32x | $122.16 Million | $92.59 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2005 | 1.36x | $96.99 Million | $71.25 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2004 | 2.01x | $47.96 Million | $23.89 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2003 | 1.71x | $49.42 Million | $28.97 Million | ▲ +44.9% |
| 2002 | 1.18x | $29.74 Million | $25.25 Million | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2001 | 3.91x | $95.14 Million | $24.36 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2000 | 1.73x | $114.73 Million | $66.50 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 1999 | 1.89x | $150.39 Million | $79.40 Million | ▼ -61.0% |
| 1998 | 4.86x | $129.67 Million | $26.69 Million | ▲ +215.1% |
| 1997 | 1.54x | $64.83 Million | $42.04 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 1996 | 0.97x | $32.81 Million | $33.73 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1995 | 1.19x | $23.82 Million | $20.09 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 1994 | 1.33x | $22.48 Million | $16.90 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 1993 | 3.67x | $12.10 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 1991 | 4.24x | $33.10 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +677.3% |
| 1990 | 0.55x | $10.70 Million | $19.60 Million | ▲ +468.9% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $1.90 Million | $19.80 Million | — |