Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($387.96 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Enerpac Tool Group Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enerpac Tool Group Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enerpac Tool Group Corp across 37 annual periods. Also explore EPAC net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enerpac Tool Group Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Enerpac Tool Group Corp worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | $111.28 Million | $394.17 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $81.32 Million | $385.35 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $77.60 Million | $435.98 Million | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $51.74 Million | $438.14 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $54.18 Million | $408.05 Million | ▲ +2054.9% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-3.16 Million | $465.07 Million | ▼ -110.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $53.84 Million | $823.10 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $106.09 Million | $921.82 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $87.85 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $117.70 Million | $921.59 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $128.97 Million | $963.92 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $125.23 Million | $855.17 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $193.79 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $182.33 Million | $955.28 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $171.57 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $121.09 Million | $881.98 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $146.72 Million | $821.06 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $170.10 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $177.11 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $122.16 Million | $850.41 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $96.99 Million | $751.50 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $47.96 Million | $392.15 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $49.42 Million | $369.16 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $29.74 Million | $338.23 Million | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $95.14 Million | $482.47 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $114.73 Million | $579.94 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $150.39 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $129.67 Million | $832.84 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $64.83 Million | $259.48 Million | ▲ +62.0% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $32.81 Million | $212.79 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $23.82 Million | $201.26 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $22.48 Million | $210.09 Million | ▲ +79.2% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $12.10 Million | $202.70 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 1992 | 0.14x | $27.00 Million | $192.40 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 1991 | 0.16x | $33.10 Million | $209.40 Million | ▲ +310.8% |
| 1990 | 0.04x | $10.70 Million | $278.10 Million | ▲ +475.7% |
| 1989 | 0.01x | $1.90 Million | $284.30 Million | — |