Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $40.24 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($387.51 Million) in one year. See Enerpac Tool Group Corp financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enerpac Tool Group Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enerpac Tool Group Corp across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Enerpac Tool Group Corp generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enerpac Tool Group Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. Check EPAC cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | $111.28 Million | $394.17 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $81.32 Million | $385.35 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $77.60 Million | $435.98 Million | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $51.74 Million | $438.14 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $54.18 Million | $408.05 Million | ▲ +2054.9% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-3.16 Million | $465.07 Million | ▼ -110.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $53.84 Million | $823.10 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $106.09 Million | $921.82 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $87.85 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $117.70 Million | $921.59 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $128.97 Million | $963.92 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $125.23 Million | $855.17 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $193.79 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $182.33 Million | $955.28 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $171.57 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $121.09 Million | $881.98 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $146.72 Million | $821.06 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $170.10 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $177.11 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $122.16 Million | $850.41 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $96.99 Million | $751.50 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $47.96 Million | $392.15 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $49.42 Million | $369.16 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $29.74 Million | $338.23 Million | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $95.14 Million | $482.47 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $114.73 Million | $579.94 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $150.39 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $129.67 Million | $832.84 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $64.83 Million | $259.48 Million | ▲ +62.0% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $32.81 Million | $212.79 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $23.82 Million | $201.26 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $22.48 Million | $210.09 Million | ▲ +79.2% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $12.10 Million | $202.70 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 1992 | 0.14x | $27.00 Million | $192.40 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 1991 | 0.16x | $33.10 Million | $209.40 Million | ▲ +310.8% |
| 1990 | 0.04x | $10.70 Million | $278.10 Million | ▲ +475.7% |
| 1989 | 0.01x | $1.90 Million | $284.30 Million | — |