Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($387.96 Million) in one year. Check Enerpac Tool Group Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enerpac Tool Group Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enerpac Tool Group Corp across 37 annual periods. Also explore Enerpac Tool Group Corp balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enerpac Tool Group Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | $111.28 Million | $394.17 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $81.32 Million | $385.35 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $77.60 Million | $435.98 Million | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $51.74 Million | $438.14 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $54.18 Million | $408.05 Million | ▲ +2054.9% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-3.16 Million | $465.07 Million | ▼ -110.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $53.84 Million | $823.10 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $106.09 Million | $921.82 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $87.85 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $117.70 Million | $921.59 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $128.97 Million | $963.92 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $125.23 Million | $855.17 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $193.79 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $182.33 Million | $955.28 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $171.57 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $121.09 Million | $881.98 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $146.72 Million | $821.06 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $170.10 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $177.11 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $122.16 Million | $850.41 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $96.99 Million | $751.50 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $47.96 Million | $392.15 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $49.42 Million | $369.16 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $29.74 Million | $338.23 Million | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $95.14 Million | $482.47 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $114.73 Million | $579.94 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $150.39 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $129.67 Million | $832.84 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $64.83 Million | $259.48 Million | ▲ +62.0% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $32.81 Million | $212.79 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $23.82 Million | $201.26 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $22.48 Million | $210.09 Million | ▲ +79.2% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $12.10 Million | $202.70 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 1992 | 0.14x | $27.00 Million | $192.40 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 1991 | 0.16x | $33.10 Million | $209.40 Million | ▲ +310.8% |
| 1990 | 0.04x | $10.70 Million | $278.10 Million | ▲ +475.7% |
| 1989 | 0.01x | $1.90 Million | $284.30 Million | — |