Enerpac Tool Group Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $40.24 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($387.51 Million) in one year. Check Enerpac Tool Group Corp earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Enerpac Tool Group Corp (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Enerpac Tool Group Corp from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Enerpac Tool Group Corp across 37 annual periods. Check Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Enerpac Tool Group Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Enerpac Tool Group Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | $111.28 Million | $394.17 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $81.32 Million | $385.35 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $77.60 Million | $435.98 Million | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $51.74 Million | $438.14 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $54.18 Million | $408.05 Million | ▲ +2054.9% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-3.16 Million | $465.07 Million | ▼ -110.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $53.84 Million | $823.10 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $106.09 Million | $921.82 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $87.85 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $117.70 Million | $921.59 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | $128.97 Million | $963.92 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $125.23 Million | $855.17 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $193.79 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.19x | $182.33 Million | $955.28 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $171.57 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $121.09 Million | $881.98 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $146.72 Million | $821.06 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $170.10 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $177.11 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $122.16 Million | $850.41 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $96.99 Million | $751.50 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $47.96 Million | $392.15 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $49.42 Million | $369.16 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $29.74 Million | $338.23 Million | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $95.14 Million | $482.47 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $114.73 Million | $579.94 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $150.39 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $129.67 Million | $832.84 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $64.83 Million | $259.48 Million | ▲ +62.0% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $32.81 Million | $212.79 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $23.82 Million | $201.26 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $22.48 Million | $210.09 Million | ▲ +79.2% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $12.10 Million | $202.70 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 1992 | 0.14x | $27.00 Million | $192.40 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 1991 | 0.16x | $33.10 Million | $209.40 Million | ▲ +310.8% |
| 1990 | 0.04x | $10.70 Million | $278.10 Million | ▲ +475.7% |
| 1989 | 0.01x | $1.90 Million | $284.30 Million | — |