Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.21x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $23.90 Million exceeds net income of $19.70 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Helios Technologies Inc cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Helios Technologies Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1995–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Helios Technologies Inc across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Helios Technologies Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Helios Technologies Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Helios Technologies Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see HLIO stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.63x | $127.30 Million | $48.40 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2024 | 3.13x | $122.10 Million | $39.00 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2023 | 2.24x | $83.90 Million | $37.50 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 2022 | 1.12x | $109.90 Million | $98.40 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2021 | 1.08x | $113.20 Million | $104.60 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2020 | 7.64x | $108.56 Million | $14.22 Million | ▲ +408.6% |
| 2019 | 1.50x | $90.48 Million | $60.27 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2018 | 1.66x | $77.45 Million | $46.73 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2017 | 1.56x | $49.38 Million | $31.56 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2016 | 1.65x | $38.51 Million | $23.30 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2015 | 1.51x | $49.90 Million | $33.14 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2014 | 1.44x | $62.85 Million | $43.77 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2013 | 1.24x | $47.12 Million | $37.98 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2012 | 1.40x | $52.20 Million | $37.40 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2011 | 1.31x | $49.54 Million | $37.68 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2010 | 1.17x | $25.09 Million | $21.40 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 2009 | 7.36x | $13.67 Million | $1.86 Million | ▲ +391.9% |
| 2008 | 1.50x | $38.53 Million | $25.73 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2007 | 1.28x | $28.24 Million | $22.13 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2006 | 1.21x | $19.61 Million | $16.22 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2005 | 1.33x | $17.01 Million | $12.81 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2004 | 1.91x | $14.96 Million | $7.83 Million | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2003 | 4.27x | $9.29 Million | $2.18 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2002 | 4.21x | $7.49 Million | $1.78 Million | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2001 | 7.64x | $7.26 Million | $950.00K | ▲ +214.4% |
| 2000 | 2.43x | $9.53 Million | $3.92 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 1999 | 3.11x | $5.60 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +102.6% |
| 1998 | 1.54x | $8.60 Million | $5.60 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 1997 | 1.38x | $6.50 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 1996 | 2.41x | $7.00 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 1995 | 2.15x | $12.70 Million | $5.90 Million | — |