Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($575.30 Million) in one year. See Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Helios Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Helios Technologies Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Helios Technologies Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Helios Technologies Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Helios Technologies Inc. Check Helios Technologies Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $127.30 Million | $583.00 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $122.10 Million | $641.00 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $83.90 Million | $735.80 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $109.90 Million | $668.80 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $113.20 Million | $706.30 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $108.56 Million | $689.19 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $90.48 Million | $444.12 Million | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $77.45 Million | $511.40 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $49.38 Million | $187.09 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $38.51 Million | $208.38 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 2015 | 2.58x | $49.90 Million | $19.35 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 2.56x | $62.85 Million | $24.50 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2013 | 2.14x | $47.12 Million | $22.05 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2012 | 2.63x | $52.20 Million | $19.85 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2011 | 2.23x | $49.54 Million | $22.25 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2010 | 1.48x | $25.09 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2009 | 1.11x | $13.67 Million | $12.32 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2008 | 2.43x | $38.53 Million | $15.83 Million | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2007 | 1.49x | $28.24 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2006 | 1.20x | $19.61 Million | $16.39 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.99x | $17.01 Million | $17.12 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | $14.96 Million | $26.41 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $9.29 Million | $27.97 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $7.49 Million | $19.39 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $7.26 Million | $18.01 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | $9.53 Million | $20.54 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $5.60 Million | $22.90 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 1998 | 0.41x | $8.60 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1997 | 0.35x | $6.50 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $7.00 Million | $26.10 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 1995 | 1.02x | $12.70 Million | $12.40 Million | — |