Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($575.30 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Helios Technologies Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Helios Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Helios Technologies Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore HLIO total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Helios Technologies Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Helios Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Helios Technologies Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $127.30 Million | $583.00 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $122.10 Million | $641.00 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $83.90 Million | $735.80 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $109.90 Million | $668.80 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $113.20 Million | $706.30 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $108.56 Million | $689.19 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $90.48 Million | $444.12 Million | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $77.45 Million | $511.40 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $49.38 Million | $187.09 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $38.51 Million | $208.38 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 2015 | 2.58x | $49.90 Million | $19.35 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 2.56x | $62.85 Million | $24.50 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2013 | 2.14x | $47.12 Million | $22.05 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2012 | 2.63x | $52.20 Million | $19.85 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2011 | 2.23x | $49.54 Million | $22.25 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2010 | 1.48x | $25.09 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2009 | 1.11x | $13.67 Million | $12.32 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2008 | 2.43x | $38.53 Million | $15.83 Million | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2007 | 1.49x | $28.24 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2006 | 1.20x | $19.61 Million | $16.39 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.99x | $17.01 Million | $17.12 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | $14.96 Million | $26.41 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $9.29 Million | $27.97 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $7.49 Million | $19.39 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $7.26 Million | $18.01 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | $9.53 Million | $20.54 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $5.60 Million | $22.90 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 1998 | 0.41x | $8.60 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1997 | 0.35x | $6.50 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $7.00 Million | $26.10 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 1995 | 1.02x | $12.70 Million | $12.40 Million | — |