Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($575.30 Million) in one year. See Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Helios Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Helios Technologies Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore HLIO year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Helios Technologies Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Helios Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HLIO market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $127.30 Million | $583.00 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $122.10 Million | $641.00 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $83.90 Million | $735.80 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $109.90 Million | $668.80 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $113.20 Million | $706.30 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $108.56 Million | $689.19 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $90.48 Million | $444.12 Million | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $77.45 Million | $511.40 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $49.38 Million | $187.09 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $38.51 Million | $208.38 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 2015 | 2.58x | $49.90 Million | $19.35 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 2.56x | $62.85 Million | $24.50 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2013 | 2.14x | $47.12 Million | $22.05 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2012 | 2.63x | $52.20 Million | $19.85 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2011 | 2.23x | $49.54 Million | $22.25 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2010 | 1.48x | $25.09 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2009 | 1.11x | $13.67 Million | $12.32 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2008 | 2.43x | $38.53 Million | $15.83 Million | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2007 | 1.49x | $28.24 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2006 | 1.20x | $19.61 Million | $16.39 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.99x | $17.01 Million | $17.12 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | $14.96 Million | $26.41 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $9.29 Million | $27.97 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $7.49 Million | $19.39 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $7.26 Million | $18.01 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | $9.53 Million | $20.54 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $5.60 Million | $22.90 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 1998 | 0.41x | $8.60 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1997 | 0.35x | $6.50 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $7.00 Million | $26.10 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 1995 | 1.02x | $12.70 Million | $12.40 Million | — |