Helios Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Helios Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Helios Technologies Inc (HLIO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $41.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($567.70 Million) in one year. Check HLIO operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Helios Technologies Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Helios Technologies Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Helios Technologies Inc across 31 annual periods. Check HLIO capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Helios Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Helios Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Helios Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Helios Technologies Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $127.30 Million | $583.00 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $122.10 Million | $641.00 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $83.90 Million | $735.80 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $109.90 Million | $668.80 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $113.20 Million | $706.30 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $108.56 Million | $689.19 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $90.48 Million | $444.12 Million | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $77.45 Million | $511.40 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $49.38 Million | $187.09 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $38.51 Million | $208.38 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 2015 | 2.58x | $49.90 Million | $19.35 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 2.56x | $62.85 Million | $24.50 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2013 | 2.14x | $47.12 Million | $22.05 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2012 | 2.63x | $52.20 Million | $19.85 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2011 | 2.23x | $49.54 Million | $22.25 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2010 | 1.48x | $25.09 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2009 | 1.11x | $13.67 Million | $12.32 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2008 | 2.43x | $38.53 Million | $15.83 Million | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2007 | 1.49x | $28.24 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2006 | 1.20x | $19.61 Million | $16.39 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.99x | $17.01 Million | $17.12 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | $14.96 Million | $26.41 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $9.29 Million | $27.97 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | $7.49 Million | $19.39 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $7.26 Million | $18.01 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | $9.53 Million | $20.54 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $5.60 Million | $22.90 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 1998 | 0.41x | $8.60 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1997 | 0.35x | $6.50 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $7.00 Million | $26.10 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 1995 | 1.02x | $12.70 Million | $12.40 Million | — |