Rithm Property Trust Inc. (RPT) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Rithm Property Trust Inc. (RPT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -0.01x as of June 2025. Operating cash flow of $-25.00K is below net income of $1.90 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore cash efficiency ratio of Rithm Property Trust Inc. to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Rithm Property Trust Inc. Cash Flow Quality Index (1989–2021)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Rithm Property Trust Inc. across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check RPT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Rithm Property Trust Inc. (1989–2021)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Rithm Property Trust Inc.. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see RPT company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1.32x | $92.86 Million | $70.26 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2019 | 0.97x | $90.59 Million | $93.69 Million | ▼ -83.6% |
| 2018 | 5.89x | $106.32 Million | $18.04 Million | ▲ +253.5% |
| 2017 | 1.67x | $117.92 Million | $70.72 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2016 | 1.92x | $117.09 Million | $61.11 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2015 | 1.57x | $105.16 Million | $66.89 Million | ▼ -78.9% |
| 2013 | 7.47x | $85.58 Million | $11.46 Million | ▼ -14.9% |
| 2012 | 8.77x | $62.19 Million | $7.09 Million | ▲ +186.6% |
| 2009 | 3.06x | $48.06 Million | $15.71 Million | ▲ +164.4% |
| 2008 | 1.16x | $27.00 Million | $23.32 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 2007 | 2.22x | $85.99 Million | $38.67 Million | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2006 | 1.33x | $46.78 Million | $35.23 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2005 | 3.20x | $44.60 Million | $13.94 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2004 | 3.07x | $46.39 Million | $15.12 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2003 | 2.35x | $26.03 Million | $11.09 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2002 | 2.10x | $18.55 Million | $8.84 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2001 | 2.95x | $24.56 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 2000 | 1.46x | $17.13 Million | $11.76 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 1999 | 2.02x | $23.95 Million | $11.84 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 1998 | 1.94x | $16.79 Million | $8.66 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 1997 | 1.85x | $17.03 Million | $9.20 Million | ▼ -96.2% |
| 1996 | 48.80x | $14.25 Million | $292.00K | ▲ +7293.4% |
| 1995 | 0.66x | $2.34 Million | $3.54 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 1994 | 0.92x | $14.45 Million | $15.64 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 1993 | 3.19x | $9.90 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 1992 | 2.55x | $19.90 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +65.8% |
| 1991 | 1.54x | $19.70 Million | $12.80 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 1990 | 1.03x | $24.60 Million | $23.80 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 1989 | 1.26x | $29.90 Million | $23.70 Million | — |