Redwood Trust Inc Cash Flow Quality Index
Redwood Trust Inc cash flow quality index. Redwood Trust Inc (RWT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -168.03x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $-3.36 Billion is below net income of $20.00 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. See financial agility of Redwood Trust Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Redwood Trust Inc (1994–2024)
Cash flow quality index of Redwood Trust Inc from 1994 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Redwood Trust Inc across 25 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore debt repayment capacity of Redwood Trust Inc to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Redwood Trust Inc Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1994–2024)
Redwood Trust Inc cash flow quality index by year from 1994 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Redwood Trust Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Redwood Trust Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -108.56x | $-5.86 Billion | $54.00 Million | ▼ -509.3% |
| 2021 | -17.82x | $-5.69 Billion | $319.61 Million | ▼ -158.6% |
| 2019 | -6.89x | $-1.17 Billion | $169.18 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2018 | -13.48x | $-1.61 Billion | $119.60 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2017 | -12.20x | $-1.71 Billion | $140.41 Million | ▼ -193.5% |
| 2016 | -4.16x | $-545.65 Million | $131.25 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2015 | -12.25x | $-1.25 Billion | $102.09 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2014 | -17.81x | $-1.79 Billion | $100.57 Million | ▼ -1290.9% |
| 2013 | -1.28x | $-221.83 Million | $173.25 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2012 | -3.42x | $-450.23 Million | $131.77 Million | ▼ -605.4% |
| 2011 | 0.68x | $17.81 Million | $26.34 Million | ▲ +148.9% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | $29.89 Million | $110.05 Million | ▼ -94.9% |
| 2009 | 5.36x | $210.08 Million | $39.20 Million | ▲ +891.4% |
| 2006 | 0.54x | $68.95 Million | $127.53 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.48x | $95.40 Million | $199.87 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $95.85 Million | $232.63 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2003 | 0.52x | $69.24 Million | $132.39 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 2002 | -18.68x | $-1.06 Billion | $56.62 Million | ▼ -65.1% |
| 2001 | -11.31x | $-371.97 Million | $32.89 Million | ▼ -136.7% |
| 2000 | 30.85x | $584.08 Million | $18.93 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 1999 | 45.88x | $78.00 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +2442.9% |
| 1997 | 1.80x | $49.80 Million | $27.60 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 1996 | 1.61x | $20.50 Million | $12.70 Million | ▲ +222.8% |
| 1995 | 0.50x | $1.60 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +300.0% |
| 1994 | -0.25x | $-100.00K | $400.00K | — |