Redwood Trust Inc (RWT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Redwood Trust Inc (RWT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.51 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($25.86 Billion) in one year. Explore RWT long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Redwood Trust Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Redwood Trust Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore how large is Redwood Trust Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Redwood Trust Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Redwood Trust Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Redwood Trust Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.44x | $-10.09 Billion | $22.72 Billion | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2024 | -0.34x | $-5.86 Billion | $17.07 Billion | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2023 | -0.15x | $-2.02 Billion | $13.30 Billion | ▼ -1201.2% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-139.14 Million | $11.95 Billion | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2021 | -0.43x | $-5.69 Billion | $13.32 Billion | ▼ -681.8% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | $-505.47 Million | $9.24 Billion | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-1.17 Billion | $16.17 Billion | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2018 | -0.15x | $-1.61 Billion | $10.59 Billion | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2017 | -0.29x | $-1.71 Billion | $5.83 Billion | ▼ -133.5% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | $-545.65 Million | $4.33 Billion | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2015 | -0.25x | $-1.25 Billion | $5.08 Billion | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2014 | -0.38x | $-1.79 Billion | $4.66 Billion | ▼ -482.3% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | $-221.83 Million | $3.36 Billion | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2012 | -0.14x | $-450.23 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▼ -3811.4% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $17.81 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $29.89 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▼ -85.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $210.08 Million | $4.26 Billion | ▲ +78.6% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $145.02 Million | $5.26 Billion | ▲ +770.6% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $33.77 Million | $10.66 Billion | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $68.95 Million | $12.03 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $95.40 Million | $15.84 Billion | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | $95.85 Million | $23.91 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $69.24 Million | $17.07 Billion | ▲ +102.5% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-1.06 Billion | $6.53 Billion | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2001 | -0.17x | $-371.97 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▼ -155.9% |
| 2000 | 0.31x | $584.08 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +786.7% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $78.00 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -92.1% |
| 1998 | 0.45x | $1.16 Billion | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +2702.7% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $49.80 Million | $3.11 Billion | ▲ +54.1% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $20.50 Million | $1.97 Billion | ▲ +142.4% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $1.60 Million | $373.30 Million | ▲ +533.8% |
| 1994 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $101.20 Million | — |