Redwood Trust Inc (RWT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Redwood Trust Inc (RWT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.51 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($25.86 Billion) in one year. See Redwood Trust Inc (RWT) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Redwood Trust Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Redwood Trust Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore RWT year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Redwood Trust Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Redwood Trust Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RWT market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.44x | $-10.09 Billion | $22.72 Billion | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2024 | -0.34x | $-5.86 Billion | $17.07 Billion | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2023 | -0.15x | $-2.02 Billion | $13.30 Billion | ▼ -1201.2% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-139.14 Million | $11.95 Billion | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2021 | -0.43x | $-5.69 Billion | $13.32 Billion | ▼ -681.8% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | $-505.47 Million | $9.24 Billion | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-1.17 Billion | $16.17 Billion | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2018 | -0.15x | $-1.61 Billion | $10.59 Billion | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2017 | -0.29x | $-1.71 Billion | $5.83 Billion | ▼ -133.5% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | $-545.65 Million | $4.33 Billion | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2015 | -0.25x | $-1.25 Billion | $5.08 Billion | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2014 | -0.38x | $-1.79 Billion | $4.66 Billion | ▼ -482.3% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | $-221.83 Million | $3.36 Billion | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2012 | -0.14x | $-450.23 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▼ -3811.4% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $17.81 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $29.89 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▼ -85.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $210.08 Million | $4.26 Billion | ▲ +78.6% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $145.02 Million | $5.26 Billion | ▲ +770.6% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $33.77 Million | $10.66 Billion | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $68.95 Million | $12.03 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $95.40 Million | $15.84 Billion | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | $95.85 Million | $23.91 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $69.24 Million | $17.07 Billion | ▲ +102.5% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-1.06 Billion | $6.53 Billion | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2001 | -0.17x | $-371.97 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▼ -155.9% |
| 2000 | 0.31x | $584.08 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +786.7% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $78.00 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -92.1% |
| 1998 | 0.45x | $1.16 Billion | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +2702.7% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $49.80 Million | $3.11 Billion | ▲ +54.1% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $20.50 Million | $1.97 Billion | ▲ +142.4% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $1.60 Million | $373.30 Million | ▲ +533.8% |
| 1994 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $101.20 Million | — |