Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd Cash Flow Quality Index
Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd cash flow quality index. Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd (000752) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.29x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of CN¥34.52 Million is below net income of CN¥118.92 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore 000752 cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd (1998–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd from 1998 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd across 24 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See 000752 net asset quality score to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1998–2025)
Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd cash flow quality index by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 000752 cash flow metrics.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CNY) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.92x | CN¥132.56 Million | CN¥144.00 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2024 | 1.30x | CN¥100.47 Million | CN¥77.09 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2021 | 4.19x | CN¥36.17 Million | CN¥8.63 Million | ▲ +217.8% |
| 2020 | -3.56x | CN¥-49.97 Million | CN¥14.05 Million | ▼ -702.8% |
| 2017 | 0.59x | CN¥26.40 Million | CN¥44.76 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2016 | 2.44x | CN¥97.17 Million | CN¥39.79 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2015 | 2.02x | CN¥114.56 Million | CN¥56.75 Million | ▲ +110.0% |
| 2014 | 0.96x | CN¥68.13 Million | CN¥70.89 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2013 | 0.57x | CN¥99.93 Million | CN¥176.52 Million | ▼ -82.1% |
| 2012 | 3.17x | CN¥215.97 Million | CN¥68.16 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2011 | 3.27x | CN¥267.01 Million | CN¥81.53 Million | ▲ +2068.8% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | CN¥-9.24 Million | CN¥55.57 Million | ▼ -105.3% |
| 2009 | 3.17x | CN¥209.13 Million | CN¥66.01 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2008 | 2.97x | CN¥154.45 Million | CN¥52.02 Million | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2007 | 2.08x | CN¥89.63 Million | CN¥43.19 Million | ▲ +3443.5% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CN¥2.24 Million | CN¥38.24 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 2005 | 0.67x | CN¥36.97 Million | CN¥55.35 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2004 | 2.14x | CN¥98.46 Million | CN¥46.07 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2003 | 2.49x | CN¥94.70 Million | CN¥38.07 Million | ▲ +22.2% |
| 2002 | 2.04x | CN¥75.08 Million | CN¥36.88 Million | ▲ +167.8% |
| 2001 | 0.76x | CN¥24.72 Million | CN¥32.53 Million | ▲ +263.3% |
| 2000 | -0.47x | CN¥-12.93 Million | CN¥27.76 Million | ▼ -139.3% |
| 1999 | 1.18x | CN¥57.11 Million | CN¥48.23 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 1998 | 1.42x | CN¥37.81 Million | CN¥26.56 Million | — |