Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd (000752) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd (000752) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥34.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥234.68 Million) in one year. See Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Develo (000752) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Develo growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tibet Galaxy Science & Technology Development Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 000752 market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.51x | CN¥132.56 Million | CN¥259.06 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | CN¥100.47 Million | CN¥373.35 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | CN¥87.92 Million | CN¥376.43 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | CN¥98.81 Million | CN¥561.95 Million | ▲ +163.0% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CN¥36.17 Million | CN¥541.02 Million | ▲ +174.4% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | CN¥-49.97 Million | CN¥556.10 Million | ▼ -228.0% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | CN¥41.30 Million | CN¥588.44 Million | ▼ -66.6% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | CN¥108.96 Million | CN¥517.81 Million | ▲ +213.1% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CN¥26.40 Million | CN¥392.86 Million | ▼ -90.7% |
| 2016 | 0.72x | CN¥97.17 Million | CN¥135.00 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2015 | 0.62x | CN¥114.56 Million | CN¥184.36 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2014 | 0.35x | CN¥68.13 Million | CN¥192.71 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2013 | 0.44x | CN¥99.93 Million | CN¥226.83 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2012 | 1.36x | CN¥215.97 Million | CN¥158.91 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2011 | 1.71x | CN¥267.01 Million | CN¥155.79 Million | ▲ +5802.6% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | CN¥-9.24 Million | CN¥307.56 Million | ▼ -104.5% |
| 2009 | 0.66x | CN¥209.13 Million | CN¥316.30 Million | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2008 | 0.54x | CN¥154.45 Million | CN¥287.19 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | CN¥89.63 Million | CN¥198.17 Million | ▲ +5789.5% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | CN¥2.24 Million | CN¥291.60 Million | ▼ -95.4% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | CN¥36.97 Million | CN¥220.59 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | CN¥98.46 Million | CN¥197.06 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2003 | 0.38x | CN¥94.70 Million | CN¥248.80 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | CN¥75.08 Million | CN¥271.80 Million | ▲ +241.6% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | CN¥24.72 Million | CN¥305.74 Million | ▲ +204.0% |
| 2000 | -0.08x | CN¥-12.93 Million | CN¥166.22 Million | ▼ -121.1% |
| 1999 | 0.37x | CN¥57.11 Million | CN¥154.90 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | CN¥37.81 Million | CN¥109.32 Million | — |