Goodfellow Inc. Cash Flow Quality Index
Goodfellow Inc. cash flow quality index. Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -1.71x as of August 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$-6.75 Million is below net income of CA$3.94 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. See Goodfellow Inc. financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Goodfellow Inc. (1997–2024)
Cash flow quality index of Goodfellow Inc. from 1997 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Goodfellow Inc. across 27 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore cash flow to debt ratio of Goodfellow Inc. to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Goodfellow Inc. Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1997–2024)
Goodfellow Inc. cash flow quality index by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Goodfellow Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Goodfellow Inc. cash conversion from operations.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | CA$-868.00K | CA$13.37 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2023 | 2.93x | CA$42.97 Million | CA$14.69 Million | ▲ +267.5% |
| 2022 | 0.80x | CA$26.01 Million | CA$32.68 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2021 | 0.88x | CA$33.28 Million | CA$37.84 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2020 | 0.83x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$13.81 Million | ▼ -81.1% |
| 2019 | 4.39x | CA$13.41 Million | CA$3.05 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2018 | 4.51x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$2.57 Million | ▲ +779.0% |
| 2015 | 0.51x | CA$4.43 Million | CA$8.62 Million | ▲ +148.8% |
| 2014 | 0.21x | CA$1.34 Million | CA$6.50 Million | ▲ +107.3% |
| 2014 | -2.82x | CA$-18.72 Million | CA$6.63 Million | ▼ -290.7% |
| 2013 | 1.48x | CA$7.82 Million | CA$5.28 Million | ▲ +242.9% |
| 2012 | -1.04x | CA$-4.51 Million | CA$4.36 Million | ▼ -179.5% |
| 2011 | 1.30x | CA$3.88 Million | CA$2.98 Million | ▲ +246.1% |
| 2010 | -0.89x | CA$-11.29 Million | CA$12.66 Million | ▼ -143.2% |
| 2009 | 2.06x | CA$22.36 Million | CA$10.84 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2008 | 2.88x | CA$20.51 Million | CA$7.12 Million | ▲ +305.4% |
| 2007 | 0.71x | CA$9.28 Million | CA$13.05 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2006 | 1.26x | CA$16.43 Million | CA$13.06 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2005 | 1.38x | CA$15.46 Million | CA$11.23 Million | ▲ +273.3% |
| 2004 | 0.37x | CA$5.39 Million | CA$14.64 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2003 | 1.89x | CA$11.86 Million | CA$6.28 Million | ▲ +275.0% |
| 2002 | -1.08x | CA$-7.96 Million | CA$7.38 Million | ▼ -174.2% |
| 2001 | 1.45x | CA$6.76 Million | CA$4.65 Million | ▲ +950.2% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | CA$794.00K | CA$5.73 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 1999 | 1.05x | CA$6.90 Million | CA$6.60 Million | ▲ +135.7% |
| 1998 | -2.93x | CA$-12.30 Million | CA$4.20 Million | ▼ -246.1% |
| 1997 | -0.85x | CA$-4.40 Million | CA$5.20 Million | — |