Goodfellow Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Goodfellow Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of August 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-6.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$103.35 Million) in one year. Check Goodfellow Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Goodfellow Inc. (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Goodfellow Inc. from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Goodfellow Inc. across 29 annual periods. Check GDL total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Goodfellow Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Goodfellow Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Goodfellow Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-868.00K | CA$85.65 Million | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2023 | 0.74x | CA$42.97 Million | CA$57.75 Million | ▲ +72.0% |
| 2022 | 0.43x | CA$26.01 Million | CA$60.14 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | CA$33.28 Million | CA$76.64 Million | ▲ +268.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$97.09 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$13.41 Million | CA$67.17 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$77.86 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$39.66 Million | CA$87.80 Million | ▲ +273.9% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | CA$-34.00 Million | CA$130.88 Million | ▼ -592.7% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | CA$4.43 Million | CA$83.98 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | CA$1.34 Million | CA$76.36 Million | ▲ +109.1% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | CA$-18.72 Million | CA$97.30 Million | ▼ -271.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | CA$7.82 Million | CA$69.80 Million | ▲ +275.7% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | CA$-4.51 Million | CA$70.71 Million | ▼ -194.4% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$3.88 Million | CA$57.51 Million | ▲ +140.5% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | CA$-11.29 Million | CA$67.70 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | CA$22.36 Million | CA$37.76 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2008 | 0.39x | CA$20.51 Million | CA$52.91 Million | ▲ +192.2% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | CA$9.28 Million | CA$69.91 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | CA$16.43 Million | CA$67.74 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | CA$15.46 Million | CA$78.04 Million | ▲ +222.9% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$5.39 Million | CA$87.97 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | CA$11.86 Million | CA$82.31 Million | ▲ +267.3% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | CA$-7.96 Million | CA$92.41 Million | ▼ -195.1% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | CA$6.76 Million | CA$74.60 Million | ▲ +841.1% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$794.00K | CA$82.47 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | CA$6.90 Million | CA$77.60 Million | ▲ +150.8% |
| 1998 | -0.17x | CA$-12.30 Million | CA$70.30 Million | ▼ -139.4% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | CA$-4.40 Million | CA$60.20 Million | — |