Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of August 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-6.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$103.35 Million) in one year. See GDL financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Goodfellow Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Goodfellow Inc. across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Goodfellow Inc. operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Goodfellow Inc. (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Goodfellow Inc.. Check how high is Goodfellow Inc.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-868.00K | CA$85.65 Million | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2023 | 0.74x | CA$42.97 Million | CA$57.75 Million | ▲ +72.0% |
| 2022 | 0.43x | CA$26.01 Million | CA$60.14 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | CA$33.28 Million | CA$76.64 Million | ▲ +268.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$97.09 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$13.41 Million | CA$67.17 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$77.86 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$39.66 Million | CA$87.80 Million | ▲ +273.9% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | CA$-34.00 Million | CA$130.88 Million | ▼ -592.7% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | CA$4.43 Million | CA$83.98 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | CA$1.34 Million | CA$76.36 Million | ▲ +109.1% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | CA$-18.72 Million | CA$97.30 Million | ▼ -271.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | CA$7.82 Million | CA$69.80 Million | ▲ +275.7% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | CA$-4.51 Million | CA$70.71 Million | ▼ -194.4% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$3.88 Million | CA$57.51 Million | ▲ +140.5% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | CA$-11.29 Million | CA$67.70 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | CA$22.36 Million | CA$37.76 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2008 | 0.39x | CA$20.51 Million | CA$52.91 Million | ▲ +192.2% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | CA$9.28 Million | CA$69.91 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | CA$16.43 Million | CA$67.74 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | CA$15.46 Million | CA$78.04 Million | ▲ +222.9% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$5.39 Million | CA$87.97 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | CA$11.86 Million | CA$82.31 Million | ▲ +267.3% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | CA$-7.96 Million | CA$92.41 Million | ▼ -195.1% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | CA$6.76 Million | CA$74.60 Million | ▲ +841.1% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$794.00K | CA$82.47 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | CA$6.90 Million | CA$77.60 Million | ▲ +150.8% |
| 1998 | -0.17x | CA$-12.30 Million | CA$70.30 Million | ▼ -139.4% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | CA$-4.40 Million | CA$60.20 Million | — |