Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of August 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-6.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$103.35 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Goodfellow Inc.'s assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Goodfellow Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Goodfellow Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Goodfellow Inc. balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Goodfellow Inc. (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Goodfellow Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Goodfellow Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-868.00K | CA$85.65 Million | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2023 | 0.74x | CA$42.97 Million | CA$57.75 Million | ▲ +72.0% |
| 2022 | 0.43x | CA$26.01 Million | CA$60.14 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | CA$33.28 Million | CA$76.64 Million | ▲ +268.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$97.09 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$13.41 Million | CA$67.17 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$77.86 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$39.66 Million | CA$87.80 Million | ▲ +273.9% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | CA$-34.00 Million | CA$130.88 Million | ▼ -592.7% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | CA$4.43 Million | CA$83.98 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | CA$1.34 Million | CA$76.36 Million | ▲ +109.1% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | CA$-18.72 Million | CA$97.30 Million | ▼ -271.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | CA$7.82 Million | CA$69.80 Million | ▲ +275.7% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | CA$-4.51 Million | CA$70.71 Million | ▼ -194.4% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$3.88 Million | CA$57.51 Million | ▲ +140.5% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | CA$-11.29 Million | CA$67.70 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | CA$22.36 Million | CA$37.76 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2008 | 0.39x | CA$20.51 Million | CA$52.91 Million | ▲ +192.2% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | CA$9.28 Million | CA$69.91 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | CA$16.43 Million | CA$67.74 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | CA$15.46 Million | CA$78.04 Million | ▲ +222.9% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$5.39 Million | CA$87.97 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | CA$11.86 Million | CA$82.31 Million | ▲ +267.3% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | CA$-7.96 Million | CA$92.41 Million | ▼ -195.1% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | CA$6.76 Million | CA$74.60 Million | ▲ +841.1% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$794.00K | CA$82.47 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | CA$6.90 Million | CA$77.60 Million | ▲ +150.8% |
| 1998 | -0.17x | CA$-12.30 Million | CA$70.30 Million | ▼ -139.4% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | CA$-4.40 Million | CA$60.20 Million | — |