Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Goodfellow Inc. (GDL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of August 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-6.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$103.35 Million) in one year. See GDL cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Goodfellow Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Goodfellow Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore GDL year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Goodfellow Inc. (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Goodfellow Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Goodfellow Inc. worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-868.00K | CA$85.65 Million | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2023 | 0.74x | CA$42.97 Million | CA$57.75 Million | ▲ +72.0% |
| 2022 | 0.43x | CA$26.01 Million | CA$60.14 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | CA$33.28 Million | CA$76.64 Million | ▲ +268.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$97.09 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$13.41 Million | CA$67.17 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$77.86 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$39.66 Million | CA$87.80 Million | ▲ +273.9% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | CA$-34.00 Million | CA$130.88 Million | ▼ -592.7% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | CA$4.43 Million | CA$83.98 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | CA$1.34 Million | CA$76.36 Million | ▲ +109.1% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | CA$-18.72 Million | CA$97.30 Million | ▼ -271.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | CA$7.82 Million | CA$69.80 Million | ▲ +275.7% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | CA$-4.51 Million | CA$70.71 Million | ▼ -194.4% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$3.88 Million | CA$57.51 Million | ▲ +140.5% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | CA$-11.29 Million | CA$67.70 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | CA$22.36 Million | CA$37.76 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2008 | 0.39x | CA$20.51 Million | CA$52.91 Million | ▲ +192.2% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | CA$9.28 Million | CA$69.91 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | CA$16.43 Million | CA$67.74 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | CA$15.46 Million | CA$78.04 Million | ▲ +222.9% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$5.39 Million | CA$87.97 Million | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | CA$11.86 Million | CA$82.31 Million | ▲ +267.3% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | CA$-7.96 Million | CA$92.41 Million | ▼ -195.1% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | CA$6.76 Million | CA$74.60 Million | ▲ +841.1% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$794.00K | CA$82.47 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | CA$6.90 Million | CA$77.60 Million | ▲ +150.8% |
| 1998 | -0.17x | CA$-12.30 Million | CA$70.30 Million | ▼ -139.4% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | CA$-4.40 Million | CA$60.20 Million | — |