Granite Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow Quality Index
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow quality index. Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.07x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$97.56 Million exceeds net income of CA$91.39 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See GRT-UN financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (2001–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust from 2001 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust across 21 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore GRT-UN operating cash to total liabilities to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (2001–2025)
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow quality index by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Granite Real Estate Investment Trust operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.13x | CA$387.67 Million | CA$342.34 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2024 | 0.94x | CA$338.61 Million | CA$360.61 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2023 | 2.26x | CA$313.18 Million | CA$138.50 Million | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2022 | 1.78x | CA$277.50 Million | CA$155.82 Million | ▲ +789.7% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | CA$262.26 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2020 | 0.57x | CA$244.32 Million | CA$429.93 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | CA$183.43 Million | CA$382.27 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2018 | 0.34x | CA$157.89 Million | CA$465.36 Million | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2017 | 0.44x | CA$158.68 Million | CA$357.75 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2016 | 0.57x | CA$159.99 Million | CA$280.69 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2015 | 0.82x | CA$159.84 Million | CA$195.54 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2014 | 1.46x | CA$92.86 Million | CA$63.66 Million | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2013 | 0.88x | CA$127.89 Million | CA$145.27 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2012 | 1.64x | CA$116.65 Million | CA$71.34 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2011 | 1.93x | CA$116.35 Million | CA$60.44 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2008 | 4.58x | CA$104.14 Million | CA$22.74 Million | ▲ +137.3% |
| 2007 | 1.93x | CA$75.73 Million | CA$39.23 Million | ▲ +117.7% |
| 2006 | 0.89x | CA$61.89 Million | CA$69.78 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 2005 | 9.10x | CA$82.80 Million | CA$9.10 Million | ▲ +243.5% |
| 2002 | 2.65x | CA$43.98 Million | CA$16.61 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2001 | 2.34x | CA$123.73 Million | CA$52.87 Million | — |