Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$97.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.04 Billion) in one year. See GRT-UN FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Granite Real Estate Investment Trust generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. Check GRT-UN operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$387.67 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$338.61 Million | CA$3.88 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$313.18 Million | CA$3.78 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$277.50 Million | CA$3.80 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | CA$262.26 Million | CA$3.25 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | CA$244.32 Million | CA$2.83 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | CA$183.43 Million | CA$1.66 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | CA$157.89 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$158.68 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$159.99 Million | CA$961.91 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$159.84 Million | CA$873.05 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$92.86 Million | CA$811.51 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$127.89 Million | CA$792.12 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | CA$116.65 Million | CA$341.20 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | CA$116.35 Million | CA$337.49 Million | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | CA$88.82 Million | CA$452.02 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | CA$109.93 Million | CA$344.09 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$104.14 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$75.73 Million | CA$997.57 Million | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$61.89 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | CA$82.80 Million | CA$1.26 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$82.12 Million | CA$1.33 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | CA$113.23 Million | CA$930.14 Million | ▲ +155.4% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | CA$43.98 Million | CA$922.65 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | CA$123.73 Million | CA$545.68 Million | — |