Granite Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio. Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$97.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.04 Billion) in one year. Check Granite Real Estate Investment Trust earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust across 25 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GRT-UN cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$387.67 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$338.61 Million | CA$3.88 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$313.18 Million | CA$3.78 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$277.50 Million | CA$3.80 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | CA$262.26 Million | CA$3.25 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | CA$244.32 Million | CA$2.83 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | CA$183.43 Million | CA$1.66 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | CA$157.89 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$158.68 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$159.99 Million | CA$961.91 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$159.84 Million | CA$873.05 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$92.86 Million | CA$811.51 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$127.89 Million | CA$792.12 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | CA$116.65 Million | CA$341.20 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | CA$116.35 Million | CA$337.49 Million | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | CA$88.82 Million | CA$452.02 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | CA$109.93 Million | CA$344.09 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$104.14 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$75.73 Million | CA$997.57 Million | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$61.89 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | CA$82.80 Million | CA$1.26 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$82.12 Million | CA$1.33 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | CA$113.23 Million | CA$930.14 Million | ▲ +155.4% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | CA$43.98 Million | CA$922.65 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | CA$123.73 Million | CA$545.68 Million | — |