Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$97.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.04 Billion) in one year. Explore GRT-UN long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust across 25 annual periods. Also explore GRT-UN current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GRT-UN stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$387.67 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$338.61 Million | CA$3.88 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$313.18 Million | CA$3.78 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$277.50 Million | CA$3.80 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | CA$262.26 Million | CA$3.25 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | CA$244.32 Million | CA$2.83 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | CA$183.43 Million | CA$1.66 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | CA$157.89 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$158.68 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$159.99 Million | CA$961.91 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$159.84 Million | CA$873.05 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$92.86 Million | CA$811.51 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$127.89 Million | CA$792.12 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | CA$116.65 Million | CA$341.20 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | CA$116.35 Million | CA$337.49 Million | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | CA$88.82 Million | CA$452.02 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | CA$109.93 Million | CA$344.09 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$104.14 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$75.73 Million | CA$997.57 Million | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$61.89 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | CA$82.80 Million | CA$1.26 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$82.12 Million | CA$1.33 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | CA$113.23 Million | CA$930.14 Million | ▲ +155.4% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | CA$43.98 Million | CA$922.65 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | CA$123.73 Million | CA$545.68 Million | — |