Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$97.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.04 Billion) in one year. See Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust across 25 annual periods. Also explore Granite Real Estate Investment Trust net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GRT-UN stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$387.67 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$338.61 Million | CA$3.88 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$313.18 Million | CA$3.78 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$277.50 Million | CA$3.80 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | CA$262.26 Million | CA$3.25 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | CA$244.32 Million | CA$2.83 Billion | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | CA$183.43 Million | CA$1.66 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | CA$157.89 Million | CA$1.69 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$158.68 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$159.99 Million | CA$961.91 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$159.84 Million | CA$873.05 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$92.86 Million | CA$811.51 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$127.89 Million | CA$792.12 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | CA$116.65 Million | CA$341.20 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2011 | 0.34x | CA$116.35 Million | CA$337.49 Million | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | CA$88.82 Million | CA$452.02 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | CA$109.93 Million | CA$344.09 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$104.14 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$75.73 Million | CA$997.57 Million | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$61.89 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | CA$82.80 Million | CA$1.26 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$82.12 Million | CA$1.33 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | CA$113.23 Million | CA$930.14 Million | ▲ +155.4% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | CA$43.98 Million | CA$922.65 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | CA$123.73 Million | CA$545.68 Million | — |