Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (LIF) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (LIF) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.08x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$32.75 Million exceeds net income of CA$30.45 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (LIF) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp Cash Flow Quality Index (1998–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp across 27 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (1998–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see LIF market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.15x | CA$201.91 Million | CA$175.04 Million | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2023 | 0.82x | CA$152.49 Million | CA$186.31 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2022 | 0.69x | CA$184.19 Million | CA$265.45 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2021 | 1.06x | CA$402.42 Million | CA$379.77 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2020 | 0.77x | CA$175.43 Million | CA$227.19 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2019 | 1.09x | CA$224.56 Million | CA$205.34 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2018 | 1.16x | CA$148.80 Million | CA$128.49 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2017 | 1.06x | CA$166.96 Million | CA$157.28 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2016 | 0.81x | CA$63.47 Million | CA$78.17 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2015 | 1.10x | CA$59.91 Million | CA$54.66 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 1.09x | CA$113.54 Million | CA$104.13 Million | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2013 | 0.82x | CA$121.69 Million | CA$148.83 Million | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2012 | 0.52x | CA$51.47 Million | CA$99.29 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2011 | 0.68x | CA$121.93 Million | CA$179.31 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2010 | 0.79x | CA$155.92 Million | CA$196.70 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2009 | 0.56x | CA$42.41 Million | CA$75.07 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2008 | 1.05x | CA$186.19 Million | CA$176.52 Million | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2007 | 0.83x | CA$67.20 Million | CA$80.92 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2006 | 0.64x | CA$60.02 Million | CA$94.42 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2005 | 0.84x | CA$72.71 Million | CA$86.05 Million | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2004 | 1.53x | CA$30.52 Million | CA$19.91 Million | ▲ +212.2% |
| 2003 | 0.49x | CA$27.15 Million | CA$55.28 Million | ▼ -79.4% |
| 2002 | 2.38x | CA$26.92 Million | CA$11.31 Million | ▲ +165.3% |
| 2001 | 0.90x | CA$26.36 Million | CA$29.39 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2000 | 0.75x | CA$35.53 Million | CA$47.50 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 1999 | 0.90x | CA$27.84 Million | CA$31.01 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 1998 | 1.27x | CA$45.06 Million | CA$35.38 Million | — |