Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (LIF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$32.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$167.46 Million) in one year. Check LIF cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp across 27 annual periods. Check Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (LIF) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.05x | CA$201.91 Million | CA$193.19 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | CA$152.49 Million | CA$177.71 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2022 | 0.98x | CA$184.19 Million | CA$188.31 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2021 | 1.79x | CA$402.42 Million | CA$225.25 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 2020 | 0.68x | CA$175.43 Million | CA$256.85 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2019 | 1.09x | CA$224.56 Million | CA$205.69 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2018 | 0.86x | CA$148.80 Million | CA$172.74 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2017 | 0.94x | CA$166.96 Million | CA$176.72 Million | ▲ +127.9% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | CA$63.47 Million | CA$153.13 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | CA$59.91 Million | CA$145.08 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2014 | 0.74x | CA$113.54 Million | CA$153.27 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2013 | 0.63x | CA$121.69 Million | CA$192.30 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | CA$51.47 Million | CA$151.81 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | CA$121.93 Million | CA$395.25 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | CA$155.92 Million | CA$444.71 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | CA$42.41 Million | CA$126.79 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2008 | 1.22x | CA$186.19 Million | CA$152.24 Million | ▲ +132.9% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | CA$67.20 Million | CA$127.98 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | CA$60.02 Million | CA$147.87 Million | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | CA$72.71 Million | CA$181.15 Million | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | CA$30.52 Million | CA$145.09 Million | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$27.15 Million | CA$181.96 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | CA$26.92 Million | CA$209.38 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$26.36 Million | CA$213.14 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | CA$35.53 Million | CA$199.40 Million | ▼ -71.9% |
| 1999 | 0.63x | CA$27.84 Million | CA$43.93 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 1998 | 2.35x | CA$45.06 Million | CA$19.18 Million | — |