Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (LIF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (LIF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$32.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$167.46 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp across 27 annual periods. Also explore Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corp (LIF) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.05x | CA$201.91 Million | CA$193.19 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | CA$152.49 Million | CA$177.71 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2022 | 0.98x | CA$184.19 Million | CA$188.31 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2021 | 1.79x | CA$402.42 Million | CA$225.25 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 2020 | 0.68x | CA$175.43 Million | CA$256.85 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 2019 | 1.09x | CA$224.56 Million | CA$205.69 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2018 | 0.86x | CA$148.80 Million | CA$172.74 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2017 | 0.94x | CA$166.96 Million | CA$176.72 Million | ▲ +127.9% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | CA$63.47 Million | CA$153.13 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | CA$59.91 Million | CA$145.08 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2014 | 0.74x | CA$113.54 Million | CA$153.27 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2013 | 0.63x | CA$121.69 Million | CA$192.30 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | CA$51.47 Million | CA$151.81 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | CA$121.93 Million | CA$395.25 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | CA$155.92 Million | CA$444.71 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | CA$42.41 Million | CA$126.79 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2008 | 1.22x | CA$186.19 Million | CA$152.24 Million | ▲ +132.9% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | CA$67.20 Million | CA$127.98 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | CA$60.02 Million | CA$147.87 Million | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | CA$72.71 Million | CA$181.15 Million | ▲ +90.8% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | CA$30.52 Million | CA$145.09 Million | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$27.15 Million | CA$181.96 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | CA$26.92 Million | CA$209.38 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$26.36 Million | CA$213.14 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | CA$35.53 Million | CA$199.40 Million | ▼ -71.9% |
| 1999 | 0.63x | CA$27.84 Million | CA$43.93 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 1998 | 2.35x | CA$45.06 Million | CA$19.18 Million | — |