Rogers Sugar Inc. Cash Flow Quality Index
Rogers Sugar Inc. cash flow quality index. Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 3.72x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$47.06 Million exceeds net income of CA$12.65 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore how well can Rogers Sugar Inc. service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Rogers Sugar Inc. (1998–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Rogers Sugar Inc. from 1998 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Rogers Sugar Inc. across 24 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See Rogers Sugar Inc. net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Rogers Sugar Inc. Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1998–2025)
Rogers Sugar Inc. cash flow quality index by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Rogers Sugar Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI) cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.88x | CA$121.44 Million | CA$64.45 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2024 | 1.49x | CA$79.79 Million | CA$53.73 Million | ▲ +73.5% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | CA$44.32 Million | CA$51.79 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2021 | 1.65x | CA$78.58 Million | CA$47.53 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2020 | 1.82x | CA$64.60 Million | CA$35.42 Million | ▲ +68.0% |
| 2018 | 1.09x | CA$52.91 Million | CA$48.73 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2017 | 2.52x | CA$55.13 Million | CA$21.91 Million | ▲ +147.6% |
| 2016 | 1.02x | CA$66.67 Million | CA$65.58 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2015 | 2.31x | CA$55.48 Million | CA$24.03 Million | ▲ +111.1% |
| 2014 | 1.09x | CA$31.96 Million | CA$29.23 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2013 | 1.01x | CA$37.65 Million | CA$37.27 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2012 | 1.58x | CA$47.79 Million | CA$30.26 Million | ▲ +210.2% |
| 2011 | 0.51x | CA$22.52 Million | CA$44.22 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2010 | 1.84x | CA$83.20 Million | CA$45.21 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2009 | 1.64x | CA$69.79 Million | CA$42.54 Million | ▲ +241.1% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | CA$23.00 Million | CA$47.81 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2007 | 1.96x | CA$88.61 Million | CA$45.13 Million | ▲ +160.6% |
| 2006 | 0.75x | CA$30.83 Million | CA$40.92 Million | ▼ -61.1% |
| 2004 | 1.94x | CA$83.67 Million | CA$43.15 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2003 | 1.35x | CA$44.39 Million | CA$32.90 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2002 | 0.79x | CA$25.27 Million | CA$31.87 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2000 | 1.00x | CA$31.56 Million | CA$31.56 Million | ▲ +381.1% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | CA$-12.70 Million | CA$35.70 Million | ▼ -120.3% |
| 1998 | 1.75x | CA$29.10 Million | CA$16.60 Million | — |