Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$47.06 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$651.96 Million) in one year. Explore RSI long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rogers Sugar Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rogers Sugar Inc. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Rogers Sugar Inc. asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rogers Sugar Inc. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rogers Sugar Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Rogers Sugar Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | CA$121.44 Million | CA$704.39 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | CA$79.79 Million | CA$656.33 Million | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | CA$44.32 Million | CA$654.00 Million | ▲ +103.3% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | CA$21.55 Million | CA$646.54 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | CA$78.58 Million | CA$560.97 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | CA$64.60 Million | CA$616.95 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | CA$55.87 Million | CA$549.60 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$52.91 Million | CA$520.56 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | CA$55.13 Million | CA$499.84 Million | ▼ -47.1% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | CA$66.67 Million | CA$319.64 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$55.48 Million | CA$311.87 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | CA$31.96 Million | CA$318.25 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | CA$37.65 Million | CA$298.73 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | CA$47.79 Million | CA$316.72 Million | ▲ +116.0% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$22.52 Million | CA$322.33 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | CA$83.20 Million | CA$312.00 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | CA$69.79 Million | CA$307.44 Million | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CA$23.00 Million | CA$313.76 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2007 | 0.27x | CA$88.61 Million | CA$323.62 Million | ▲ +195.3% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | CA$30.83 Million | CA$332.57 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | CA$35.49 Million | CA$245.37 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | CA$83.67 Million | CA$247.49 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2003 | 1.17x | CA$44.39 Million | CA$37.90 Million | ▲ +93.0% |
| 2002 | 0.61x | CA$25.27 Million | CA$41.65 Million | ▼ -88.7% |
| 2001 | 5.36x | CA$24.08 Million | CA$4.49 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2000 | 3.90x | CA$31.56 Million | CA$8.10 Million | ▲ +345.4% |
| 1999 | -1.59x | CA$-12.70 Million | CA$8.00 Million | ▼ -155.6% |
| 1998 | 2.85x | CA$29.10 Million | CA$10.20 Million | — |