Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$47.06 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$651.96 Million) in one year. See RSI cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rogers Sugar Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rogers Sugar Inc. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Rogers Sugar Inc. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rogers Sugar Inc. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rogers Sugar Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Rogers Sugar Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | CA$121.44 Million | CA$704.39 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | CA$79.79 Million | CA$656.33 Million | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | CA$44.32 Million | CA$654.00 Million | ▲ +103.3% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | CA$21.55 Million | CA$646.54 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | CA$78.58 Million | CA$560.97 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | CA$64.60 Million | CA$616.95 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | CA$55.87 Million | CA$549.60 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$52.91 Million | CA$520.56 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | CA$55.13 Million | CA$499.84 Million | ▼ -47.1% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | CA$66.67 Million | CA$319.64 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$55.48 Million | CA$311.87 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | CA$31.96 Million | CA$318.25 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | CA$37.65 Million | CA$298.73 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | CA$47.79 Million | CA$316.72 Million | ▲ +116.0% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$22.52 Million | CA$322.33 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | CA$83.20 Million | CA$312.00 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | CA$69.79 Million | CA$307.44 Million | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CA$23.00 Million | CA$313.76 Million | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2007 | 0.27x | CA$88.61 Million | CA$323.62 Million | ▲ +195.3% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | CA$30.83 Million | CA$332.57 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | CA$35.49 Million | CA$245.37 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | CA$83.67 Million | CA$247.49 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2003 | 1.17x | CA$44.39 Million | CA$37.90 Million | ▲ +93.0% |
| 2002 | 0.61x | CA$25.27 Million | CA$41.65 Million | ▼ -88.7% |
| 2001 | 5.36x | CA$24.08 Million | CA$4.49 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2000 | 3.90x | CA$31.56 Million | CA$8.10 Million | ▲ +345.4% |
| 1999 | -1.59x | CA$-12.70 Million | CA$8.00 Million | ▼ -155.6% |
| 1998 | 2.85x | CA$29.10 Million | CA$10.20 Million | — |