SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) — Cash Flow Quality Index
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.38x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$90.91 Million exceeds net income of CA$65.67 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore SRU-UN debt coverage from operations to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1998–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.28x | CA$374.21 Million | CA$292.07 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | CA$330.85 Million | CA$510.10 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2022 | 0.58x | CA$370.76 Million | CA$635.97 Million | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | CA$371.62 Million | CA$987.68 Million | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2020 | 3.29x | CA$295.98 Million | CA$89.94 Million | ▲ +256.3% |
| 2019 | 0.92x | CA$345.61 Million | CA$374.20 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2018 | 0.87x | CA$351.25 Million | CA$402.95 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2017 | 0.99x | CA$353.08 Million | CA$355.93 Million | ▲ +21.1% |
| 2016 | 0.82x | CA$316.34 Million | CA$386.13 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2015 | 0.93x | CA$296.25 Million | CA$319.49 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | CA$224.27 Million | CA$263.71 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2013 | 0.74x | CA$235.82 Million | CA$316.62 Million | ▲ +264.5% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | CA$213.54 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2011 | 0.96x | CA$199.51 Million | CA$206.79 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2010 | 12.02x | CA$139.98 Million | CA$11.64 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2009 | 6.13x | CA$142.78 Million | CA$23.29 Million | ▲ +281.6% |
| 2008 | 1.61x | CA$144.07 Million | CA$89.65 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2007 | 5.28x | CA$160.87 Million | CA$30.50 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2006 | 4.45x | CA$92.44 Million | CA$20.77 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2005 | 2.65x | CA$70.84 Million | CA$26.75 Million | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2004 | 2.62x | CA$35.14 Million | CA$13.41 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2003 | 1.10x | CA$9.82 Million | CA$8.96 Million | ▲ +502.6% |
| 2001 | -0.27x | CA$-79.76K | CA$292.98K | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2000 | 4.42x | CA$404.12K | CA$91.39K | ▲ +102.2% |
| 1999 | 2.19x | CA$182.04K | CA$83.25K | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1998 | 3.71x | CA$191.49K | CA$51.63K | — |