SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) — Cash Flow Quality Index
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.38x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$90.91 Million exceeds net income of CA$65.67 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore SRU-UN long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1998–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus (SRU-UN) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.28x | CA$374.21 Million | CA$292.07 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | CA$330.85 Million | CA$510.10 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2022 | 0.58x | CA$370.76 Million | CA$635.97 Million | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | CA$371.62 Million | CA$987.68 Million | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2020 | 3.29x | CA$295.98 Million | CA$89.94 Million | ▲ +256.3% |
| 2019 | 0.92x | CA$345.61 Million | CA$374.20 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2018 | 0.87x | CA$351.25 Million | CA$402.95 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2017 | 0.99x | CA$353.08 Million | CA$355.93 Million | ▲ +21.1% |
| 2016 | 0.82x | CA$316.34 Million | CA$386.13 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2015 | 0.93x | CA$296.25 Million | CA$319.49 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | CA$224.27 Million | CA$263.71 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2013 | 0.74x | CA$235.82 Million | CA$316.62 Million | ▲ +264.5% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | CA$213.54 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2011 | 0.96x | CA$199.51 Million | CA$206.79 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2010 | 12.02x | CA$139.98 Million | CA$11.64 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2009 | 6.13x | CA$142.78 Million | CA$23.29 Million | ▲ +281.6% |
| 2008 | 1.61x | CA$144.07 Million | CA$89.65 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2007 | 5.28x | CA$160.87 Million | CA$30.50 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2006 | 4.45x | CA$92.44 Million | CA$20.77 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2005 | 2.65x | CA$70.84 Million | CA$26.75 Million | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2004 | 2.62x | CA$35.14 Million | CA$13.41 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2003 | 1.10x | CA$9.82 Million | CA$8.96 Million | ▲ +502.6% |
| 2001 | -0.27x | CA$-79.76K | CA$292.98K | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2000 | 4.42x | CA$404.12K | CA$91.39K | ▲ +102.2% |
| 1999 | 2.19x | CA$182.04K | CA$83.25K | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1998 | 3.71x | CA$191.49K | CA$51.63K | — |