SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) — Cash Flow Quality Index
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.38x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$90.91 Million exceeds net income of CA$65.67 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1998–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see SRU-UN market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.28x | CA$374.21 Million | CA$292.07 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | CA$330.85 Million | CA$510.10 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2022 | 0.58x | CA$370.76 Million | CA$635.97 Million | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | CA$371.62 Million | CA$987.68 Million | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2020 | 3.29x | CA$295.98 Million | CA$89.94 Million | ▲ +256.3% |
| 2019 | 0.92x | CA$345.61 Million | CA$374.20 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2018 | 0.87x | CA$351.25 Million | CA$402.95 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2017 | 0.99x | CA$353.08 Million | CA$355.93 Million | ▲ +21.1% |
| 2016 | 0.82x | CA$316.34 Million | CA$386.13 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2015 | 0.93x | CA$296.25 Million | CA$319.49 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | CA$224.27 Million | CA$263.71 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2013 | 0.74x | CA$235.82 Million | CA$316.62 Million | ▲ +264.5% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | CA$213.54 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2011 | 0.96x | CA$199.51 Million | CA$206.79 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2010 | 12.02x | CA$139.98 Million | CA$11.64 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2009 | 6.13x | CA$142.78 Million | CA$23.29 Million | ▲ +281.6% |
| 2008 | 1.61x | CA$144.07 Million | CA$89.65 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2007 | 5.28x | CA$160.87 Million | CA$30.50 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2006 | 4.45x | CA$92.44 Million | CA$20.77 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2005 | 2.65x | CA$70.84 Million | CA$26.75 Million | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2004 | 2.62x | CA$35.14 Million | CA$13.41 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2003 | 1.10x | CA$9.82 Million | CA$8.96 Million | ▲ +502.6% |
| 2001 | -0.27x | CA$-79.76K | CA$292.98K | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2000 | 4.42x | CA$404.12K | CA$91.39K | ▲ +102.2% |
| 1999 | 2.19x | CA$182.04K | CA$83.25K | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1998 | 3.71x | CA$191.49K | CA$51.63K | — |