SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow Quality Index
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow quality index. SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.38x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$90.91 Million exceeds net income of CA$65.67 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus (SRU-UN) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2024)
Cash flow quality index of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust from 1998 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore SRU-UN debt coverage from operations to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1998–2024)
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow quality index by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SRU-UN operating cash flow.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.28x | CA$374.21 Million | CA$292.07 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | CA$330.85 Million | CA$510.10 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2022 | 0.58x | CA$370.76 Million | CA$635.97 Million | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | CA$371.62 Million | CA$987.68 Million | ▼ -88.6% |
| 2020 | 3.29x | CA$295.98 Million | CA$89.94 Million | ▲ +256.3% |
| 2019 | 0.92x | CA$345.61 Million | CA$374.20 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2018 | 0.87x | CA$351.25 Million | CA$402.95 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2017 | 0.99x | CA$353.08 Million | CA$355.93 Million | ▲ +21.1% |
| 2016 | 0.82x | CA$316.34 Million | CA$386.13 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2015 | 0.93x | CA$296.25 Million | CA$319.49 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | CA$224.27 Million | CA$263.71 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2013 | 0.74x | CA$235.82 Million | CA$316.62 Million | ▲ +264.5% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | CA$213.54 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2011 | 0.96x | CA$199.51 Million | CA$206.79 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2010 | 12.02x | CA$139.98 Million | CA$11.64 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2009 | 6.13x | CA$142.78 Million | CA$23.29 Million | ▲ +281.6% |
| 2008 | 1.61x | CA$144.07 Million | CA$89.65 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2007 | 5.28x | CA$160.87 Million | CA$30.50 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2006 | 4.45x | CA$92.44 Million | CA$20.77 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2005 | 2.65x | CA$70.84 Million | CA$26.75 Million | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2004 | 2.62x | CA$35.14 Million | CA$13.41 Million | ▲ +139.0% |
| 2003 | 1.10x | CA$9.82 Million | CA$8.96 Million | ▲ +502.6% |
| 2001 | -0.27x | CA$-79.76K | CA$292.98K | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2000 | 4.42x | CA$404.12K | CA$91.39K | ▲ +102.2% |
| 1999 | 2.19x | CA$182.04K | CA$83.25K | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1998 | 3.71x | CA$191.49K | CA$51.63K | — |