SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$90.91 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.79 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. Also explore SRU-UN net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | CA$374.21 Million | CA$5.60 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | CA$330.85 Million | CA$5.55 Billion | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$370.76 Million | CA$5.54 Billion | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$371.62 Million | CA$5.45 Billion | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$295.98 Million | CA$5.56 Billion | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$345.61 Million | CA$4.56 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$351.25 Million | CA$4.45 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | CA$353.08 Million | CA$4.55 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | CA$316.34 Million | CA$4.07 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$296.25 Million | CA$4.02 Billion | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$224.27 Million | CA$3.20 Billion | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | CA$235.82 Million | CA$3.27 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$213.54 Million | CA$2.84 Billion | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | CA$199.51 Million | CA$3.40 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | CA$139.98 Million | CA$2.82 Billion | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CA$142.78 Million | CA$2.86 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | CA$144.07 Million | CA$2.76 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | CA$160.87 Million | CA$2.46 Billion | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | CA$92.44 Million | CA$2.09 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$70.84 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$35.14 Million | CA$623.11 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | CA$9.82 Million | CA$122.87 Million | ▲ +567.4% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | CA$-79.76K | CA$4.66 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$404.12K | CA$6.66 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | CA$182.04K | CA$5.81 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | CA$191.49K | CA$2.06 Million | — |