SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio. SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$90.91 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.79 Billion) in one year. Check SRU-UN cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. Check SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | CA$374.21 Million | CA$5.60 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | CA$330.85 Million | CA$5.55 Billion | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$370.76 Million | CA$5.54 Billion | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$371.62 Million | CA$5.45 Billion | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$295.98 Million | CA$5.56 Billion | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$345.61 Million | CA$4.56 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$351.25 Million | CA$4.45 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | CA$353.08 Million | CA$4.55 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | CA$316.34 Million | CA$4.07 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$296.25 Million | CA$4.02 Billion | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$224.27 Million | CA$3.20 Billion | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | CA$235.82 Million | CA$3.27 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$213.54 Million | CA$2.84 Billion | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | CA$199.51 Million | CA$3.40 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | CA$139.98 Million | CA$2.82 Billion | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CA$142.78 Million | CA$2.86 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | CA$144.07 Million | CA$2.76 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | CA$160.87 Million | CA$2.46 Billion | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | CA$92.44 Million | CA$2.09 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$70.84 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$35.14 Million | CA$623.11 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | CA$9.82 Million | CA$122.87 Million | ▲ +567.4% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | CA$-79.76K | CA$4.66 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$404.12K | CA$6.66 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | CA$182.04K | CA$5.81 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | CA$191.49K | CA$2.06 Million | — |