SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$90.91 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.79 Billion) in one year. Explore SRU-UN long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust across 26 annual periods. Also explore how large is SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trus's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SRU-UN company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | CA$374.21 Million | CA$5.60 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | CA$330.85 Million | CA$5.55 Billion | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$370.76 Million | CA$5.54 Billion | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$371.62 Million | CA$5.45 Billion | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$295.98 Million | CA$5.56 Billion | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$345.61 Million | CA$4.56 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$351.25 Million | CA$4.45 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | CA$353.08 Million | CA$4.55 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | CA$316.34 Million | CA$4.07 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$296.25 Million | CA$4.02 Billion | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$224.27 Million | CA$3.20 Billion | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | CA$235.82 Million | CA$3.27 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | CA$213.54 Million | CA$2.84 Billion | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | CA$199.51 Million | CA$3.40 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | CA$139.98 Million | CA$2.82 Billion | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CA$142.78 Million | CA$2.86 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | CA$144.07 Million | CA$2.76 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | CA$160.87 Million | CA$2.46 Billion | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | CA$92.44 Million | CA$2.09 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$70.84 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$35.14 Million | CA$623.11 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | CA$9.82 Million | CA$122.87 Million | ▲ +567.4% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | CA$-79.76K | CA$4.66 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$404.12K | CA$6.66 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | CA$182.04K | CA$5.81 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | CA$191.49K | CA$2.06 Million | — |