Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.41x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$1.20 Million exceeds net income of CA$849.27K, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) cash conversion ratio to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Vitreous Glass Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1996–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Vitreous Glass Inc across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check how aggressively does Vitreous Glass Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Vitreous Glass Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Vitreous Glass Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Vitreous Glass Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.10x | CA$3.47 Million | CA$3.14 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2024 | 0.97x | CA$2.33 Million | CA$2.40 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2023 | 1.29x | CA$3.27 Million | CA$2.54 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2022 | 0.91x | CA$1.97 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2021 | 1.34x | CA$4.52 Million | CA$3.37 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2020 | 1.13x | CA$2.62 Million | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2019 | 0.99x | CA$1.74 Million | CA$1.77 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2018 | 0.93x | CA$1.96 Million | CA$2.12 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2017 | 1.08x | CA$2.08 Million | CA$1.92 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2016 | 1.68x | CA$3.52 Million | CA$2.09 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2015 | 1.36x | CA$2.69 Million | CA$1.97 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2014 | 1.10x | CA$2.23 Million | CA$2.02 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2013 | 1.23x | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2012 | 1.30x | CA$1.77 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2011 | 0.95x | CA$1.22 Million | CA$1.29 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2010 | 1.28x | CA$1.73 Million | CA$1.35 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2009 | 1.04x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$1.27 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2008 | 1.71x | CA$2.35 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2007 | 1.79x | CA$2.39 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2006 | 1.47x | CA$2.01 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2005 | 5.38x | CA$715.73K | CA$133.06K | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2004 | 9.60x | CA$1.83 Million | CA$190.32K | ▲ +278.6% |
| 2003 | -5.38x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$259.77K | ▼ -375.2% |
| 2002 | -1.13x | CA$-39.15K | CA$34.60K | ▼ -149.8% |
| 2001 | 2.27x | CA$953.29K | CA$419.61K | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2000 | 1.51x | CA$287.89K | CA$190.84K | ▼ -58.2% |
| 1999 | 3.61x | CA$867.48K | CA$240.14K | ▲ +704.5% |
| 1998 | 0.45x | CA$103.14K | CA$229.69K | ▼ -48.1% |
| 1997 | 0.87x | CA$285.03K | CA$329.24K | ▼ -12.5% |
| 1996 | 0.99x | CA$249.57K | CA$252.17K | — |