Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.64x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$837.87K could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.31 Million) in one year. See Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vitreous Glass Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vitreous Glass Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vitreous Glass Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vitreous Glass Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Vitreous Glass Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.08x | CA$3.47 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2024 | 2.11x | CA$2.33 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2023 | 2.60x | CA$3.27 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2022 | 1.59x | CA$1.97 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -65.3% |
| 2021 | 4.58x | CA$4.52 Million | CA$985.68K | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2020 | 2.07x | CA$2.62 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2019 | 1.59x | CA$1.74 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2018 | 1.72x | CA$1.96 Million | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2017 | 1.85x | CA$2.08 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2016 | 2.98x | CA$3.52 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2015 | 2.04x | CA$2.69 Million | CA$1.32 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2014 | 1.49x | CA$2.23 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2013 | 1.20x | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2012 | 1.23x | CA$1.77 Million | CA$1.43 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2011 | 0.65x | CA$1.22 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2010 | 0.96x | CA$1.73 Million | CA$1.79 Million | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2009 | 0.68x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$1.94 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | CA$2.35 Million | CA$2.70 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2007 | 1.69x | CA$2.39 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2006 | 1.81x | CA$2.01 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▲ +593.9% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$715.73K | CA$2.75 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | CA$1.83 Million | CA$3.86 Million | ▲ +297.6% |
| 2003 | -0.24x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$5.83 Million | ▼ -3129.5% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | CA$-39.15K | CA$5.28 Million | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | CA$953.29K | CA$4.25 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$287.89K | CA$2.14 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 1999 | 0.36x | CA$867.48K | CA$2.43 Million | ▲ +889.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | CA$103.14K | CA$2.86 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | CA$285.03K | CA$2.69 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | CA$249.57K | CA$1.69 Million | — |