Vitreous Glass Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vitreous Glass Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.80x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.20 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.50 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Vitreous Glass Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Vitreous Glass Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Vitreous Glass Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Vitreous Glass Inc across 30 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Vitreous Glass Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Vitreous Glass Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Vitreous Glass Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vitreous Glass Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see VCI cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.08x | CA$3.47 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2024 | 2.11x | CA$2.33 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2023 | 2.60x | CA$3.27 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2022 | 1.59x | CA$1.97 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -65.3% |
| 2021 | 4.58x | CA$4.52 Million | CA$985.68K | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2020 | 2.07x | CA$2.62 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2019 | 1.59x | CA$1.74 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2018 | 1.72x | CA$1.96 Million | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2017 | 1.85x | CA$2.08 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2016 | 2.98x | CA$3.52 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2015 | 2.04x | CA$2.69 Million | CA$1.32 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2014 | 1.49x | CA$2.23 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2013 | 1.20x | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2012 | 1.23x | CA$1.77 Million | CA$1.43 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2011 | 0.65x | CA$1.22 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2010 | 0.96x | CA$1.73 Million | CA$1.79 Million | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2009 | 0.68x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$1.94 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | CA$2.35 Million | CA$2.70 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2007 | 1.69x | CA$2.39 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2006 | 1.81x | CA$2.01 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▲ +593.9% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$715.73K | CA$2.75 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | CA$1.83 Million | CA$3.86 Million | ▲ +297.6% |
| 2003 | -0.24x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$5.83 Million | ▼ -3129.5% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | CA$-39.15K | CA$5.28 Million | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | CA$953.29K | CA$4.25 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$287.89K | CA$2.14 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 1999 | 0.36x | CA$867.48K | CA$2.43 Million | ▲ +889.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | CA$103.14K | CA$2.86 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | CA$285.03K | CA$2.69 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | CA$249.57K | CA$1.69 Million | — |