Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.80x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.20 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.50 Million) in one year. Check Vitreous Glass Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vitreous Glass Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vitreous Glass Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Vitreous Glass Inc (VCI) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vitreous Glass Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vitreous Glass Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see VCI market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.08x | CA$3.47 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2024 | 2.11x | CA$2.33 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2023 | 2.60x | CA$3.27 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2022 | 1.59x | CA$1.97 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -65.3% |
| 2021 | 4.58x | CA$4.52 Million | CA$985.68K | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2020 | 2.07x | CA$2.62 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2019 | 1.59x | CA$1.74 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2018 | 1.72x | CA$1.96 Million | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2017 | 1.85x | CA$2.08 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2016 | 2.98x | CA$3.52 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2015 | 2.04x | CA$2.69 Million | CA$1.32 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2014 | 1.49x | CA$2.23 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2013 | 1.20x | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2012 | 1.23x | CA$1.77 Million | CA$1.43 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2011 | 0.65x | CA$1.22 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2010 | 0.96x | CA$1.73 Million | CA$1.79 Million | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2009 | 0.68x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$1.94 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | CA$2.35 Million | CA$2.70 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2007 | 1.69x | CA$2.39 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2006 | 1.81x | CA$2.01 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▲ +593.9% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$715.73K | CA$2.75 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | CA$1.83 Million | CA$3.86 Million | ▲ +297.6% |
| 2003 | -0.24x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$5.83 Million | ▼ -3129.5% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | CA$-39.15K | CA$5.28 Million | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | CA$953.29K | CA$4.25 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$287.89K | CA$2.14 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 1999 | 0.36x | CA$867.48K | CA$2.43 Million | ▲ +889.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | CA$103.14K | CA$2.86 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | CA$285.03K | CA$2.69 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | CA$249.57K | CA$1.69 Million | — |