Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D (KRDMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL1.96 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL35.63 Billion) in one year. Check Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve T total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D (2003–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D from 2003 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D across 21 annual periods. Check how high is Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve T's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2024)
Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Class D. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve T generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.03x | TL-793.11 Million | TL30.49 Billion | ▼ -113.2% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | TL4.57 Billion | TL23.12 Billion | ▲ +268.3% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | TL-1.78 Billion | TL15.18 Billion | ▼ -127.4% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | TL5.08 Billion | TL11.85 Billion | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | TL1.69 Billion | TL6.92 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | TL1.23 Billion | TL5.15 Billion | ▲ +335.4% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | TL227.05 Million | TL4.15 Billion | ▼ -82.3% |
| 2017 | 0.31x | TL1.39 Billion | TL4.48 Billion | ▲ +267.1% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | TL288.43 Million | TL3.42 Billion | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | TL587.60 Million | TL2.79 Billion | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | TL331.92 Million | TL1.97 Billion | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | TL278.95 Million | TL1.34 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | TL266.91 Million | TL1.03 Billion | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | TL136.05 Million | TL702.49 Million | ▲ +184.1% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | TL40.44 Million | TL593.22 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | TL30.23 Million | TL430.18 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | TL125.86 Million | TL423.43 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | TL129.28 Million | TL374.25 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | TL149.71 Million | TL330.28 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | TL76.30 Million | TL275.51 Million | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2003 | 0.44x | TL137.17 Trillion | TL310.46 Trillion | — |