Tiger Brands Ltd (TBS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tiger Brands Ltd (TBS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.29x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ZAC2.86 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ZAC9.72 Billion) in one year. See TBS free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tiger Brands Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tiger Brands Ltd across 25 annual periods. Also explore Tiger Brands Ltd net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tiger Brands Ltd (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tiger Brands Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tiger Brands Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (ZAC) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | ZAC2.28 Billion | ZAC9.72 Billion | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2024 | 0.56x | ZAC4.59 Billion | ZAC8.26 Billion | ▲ +145.0% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | ZAC1.93 Billion | ZAC8.53 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | ZAC2.03 Billion | ZAC8.33 Billion | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2021 | 0.46x | ZAC3.30 Billion | ZAC7.13 Billion | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | ZAC1.61 Billion | ZAC6.55 Billion | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | ZAC2.90 Billion | ZAC6.77 Billion | ▲ +269.8% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | ZAC748.60 Million | ZAC6.46 Billion | ▼ -75.0% |
| 2017 | 0.46x | ZAC3.21 Billion | ZAC6.92 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2016 | 0.38x | ZAC3.23 Billion | ZAC8.49 Billion | ▲ +475.5% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | ZAC732.80 Million | ZAC11.08 Billion | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | ZAC1.64 Billion | ZAC10.90 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | ZAC1.45 Billion | ZAC11.31 Billion | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | ZAC1.31 Billion | ZAC6.16 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | ZAC1.44 Billion | ZAC5.95 Billion | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | ZAC1.45 Billion | ZAC4.38 Billion | ▲ +113.6% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | ZAC680.10 Million | ZAC4.40 Billion | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | ZAC620.40 Million | ZAC6.46 Billion | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | ZAC905.70 Million | ZAC6.02 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | ZAC919.40 Million | ZAC5.62 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | ZAC1.14 Billion | ZAC5.80 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | ZAC1.54 Billion | ZAC8.07 Billion | ▲ +118.3% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | ZAC673.20 Million | ZAC7.73 Billion | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | ZAC920.40 Million | ZAC7.67 Billion | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | ZAC776.30 Million | ZAC8.01 Billion | — |