Tiger Brands Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Tiger Brands Ltd tangible net worth ratio. Tiger Brands Ltd (TBS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 92.8% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (ZAC1.25 Billion) from net assets (ZAC17.24 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Tiger Brands Ltd (TBS) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Tiger Brands Ltd (2001–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Tiger Brands Ltd from 2001 to 2025. This chart shows how Tiger Brands Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 92.8%, reflecting net assets of ZAC17.24 Billion with intangible assets of ZAC1.25 Billion ZAC. See working capital position of Tiger Brands Ltd to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tiger Brands Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Tiger Brands Ltd tangible net worth ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Tiger Brands Ltd from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Tiger Brands Ltd worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (ZAC) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 92.8% | ZAC17.24 Billion | ZAC1.25 Billion | ZAC26.95 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2024 | 92.4% | ZAC18.20 Billion | ZAC1.38 Billion | ZAC26.46 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2023 | 91.9% | ZAC17.30 Billion | ZAC1.41 Billion | ZAC25.84 Billion | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2022 | 89.0% | ZAC15.69 Billion | ZAC1.72 Billion | ZAC24.02 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 89.0% | ZAC15.70 Billion | ZAC1.73 Billion | ZAC22.83 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 88.9% | ZAC15.79 Billion | ZAC1.75 Billion | ZAC22.33 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 88.7% | ZAC15.41 Billion | ZAC1.74 Billion | ZAC22.18 Billion | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2018 | 90.0% | ZAC17.47 Billion | ZAC1.75 Billion | ZAC23.93 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2017 | 89.3% | ZAC17.06 Billion | ZAC1.82 Billion | ZAC23.98 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2016 | 88.5% | ZAC16.03 Billion | ZAC1.84 Billion | ZAC24.53 Billion | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2015 | 85.5% | ZAC13.78 Billion | ZAC1.99 Billion | ZAC24.85 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2014 | 84.8% | ZAC13.95 Billion | ZAC2.12 Billion | ZAC24.85 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 83.8% | ZAC13.91 Billion | ZAC2.25 Billion | ZAC25.22 Billion | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2012 | 85.9% | ZAC11.70 Billion | ZAC1.65 Billion | ZAC17.85 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 85.7% | ZAC10.25 Billion | ZAC1.46 Billion | ZAC16.20 Billion | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2010 | 90.4% | ZAC8.60 Billion | ZAC829.70 Million | ZAC12.98 Billion | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | ZAC7.28 Billion | ZAC0.00 | ZAC11.69 Billion | ▲ +48.5 pp |
| 2008 | 51.5% | ZAC6.22 Billion | ZAC3.01 Billion | ZAC12.68 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2007 | 53.5% | ZAC6.00 Billion | ZAC2.79 Billion | ZAC12.02 Billion | ▲ +19.9 pp |
| 2006 | 33.6% | ZAC4.65 Billion | ZAC3.09 Billion | ZAC10.28 Billion | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 2005 | 26.2% | ZAC3.37 Billion | ZAC2.49 Billion | ZAC9.17 Billion | ▲ +12.0 pp |
| 2004 | 14.2% | ZAC4.18 Billion | ZAC3.59 Billion | ZAC12.26 Billion | ▼ -85.8 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | ZAC3.47 Billion | ZAC0.00 | ZAC11.20 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | ZAC2.85 Billion | ZAC0.00 | ZAC10.52 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | ZAC1.81 Billion | ZAC0.00 | ZAC9.81 Billion | — |