FGV Holdings Bhd (5222) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.03x

FGV Holdings Bhd (5222) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of RM286.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (RM11.34 Billion) in one year. See FGV Holdings Bhd free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

RM286.57 Million
MYR

Total Liabilities

RM11.34 Billion
MYR

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

FGV Holdings Bhd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for FGV Holdings Bhd across 16 annual periods. Also explore 5222 year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for FGV Holdings Bhd (2009–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FGV Holdings Bhd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FGV Holdings Bhd (5222) total market value.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (MYR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.13x RM1.61 Billion RM12.73 Billion ▲ +1.9%
2023 0.12x RM1.42 Billion RM11.45 Billion ▼ -42.9%
2022 0.22x RM2.23 Billion RM10.23 Billion ▲ +20.8%
2021 0.18x RM1.94 Billion RM10.77 Billion ▲ +13.8%
2020 0.16x RM1.76 Billion RM11.08 Billion ▼ -6.9%
2019 0.17x RM1.98 Billion RM11.60 Billion ▲ +115.2%
2018 0.08x RM957.15 Million RM12.09 Billion ▼ -37.9%
2017 0.13x RM1.62 Billion RM12.70 Billion ▲ +46.2%
2016 0.09x RM1.12 Billion RM12.83 Billion ▲ +330.5%
2015 -0.04x RM-468.63 Million RM12.40 Billion ▼ -128.7%
2014 0.13x RM1.57 Billion RM11.90 Billion ▲ +108.0%
2013 0.06x RM745.30 Million RM11.78 Billion ▼ -15.6%
2012 0.07x RM715.02 Million RM9.54 Billion ▼ -64.1%
2011 0.21x RM1.85 Billion RM8.88 Billion ▲ +354.1%
2010 -0.08x RM-247.47 Million RM3.01 Billion ▼ -3810.5%
2009 0.00x RM-6.84 Million RM3.26 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.