Dongil Ind Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: 0.15x

Dongil Ind cash flow-to-debt ratio. Dongil Ind (004890) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩9.02 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩60.97 Billion) in one year. Check Dongil Ind cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.15x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩9.02 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩60.97 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Dongil Ind (2005–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Dongil Ind from 2005 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Dongil Ind across 15 annual periods. Check Dongil Ind investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Dongil Ind Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2005–2025)

Dongil Ind cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2005 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dongil Ind. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Dongil Ind cash conversion from operations.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.03x ₩1.48 Billion ₩48.71 Billion ▼ -88.1%
2024 0.25x ₩15.09 Billion ₩59.24 Billion ▼ -12.8%
2023 0.29x ₩19.31 Billion ₩66.06 Billion ▼ -18.3%
2022 0.36x ₩29.38 Billion ₩82.13 Billion ▲ +13.6%
2021 0.31x ₩22.58 Billion ₩71.73 Billion ▼ -10.7%
2020 0.35x ₩20.11 Billion ₩57.02 Billion ▼ -24.5%
2019 0.47x ₩23.83 Billion ₩51.05 Billion ▲ +949.1%
2018 0.04x ₩2.44 Billion ₩54.79 Billion ▼ -90.4%
2017 0.47x ₩24.23 Billion ₩52.04 Billion ▼ -2.1%
2016 0.48x ₩21.36 Billion ₩44.92 Billion ▼ -63.8%
2015 1.31x ₩41.80 Billion ₩31.79 Billion ▲ +848.9%
2014 0.14x ₩5.69 Billion ₩41.05 Billion ▼ -76.1%
2013 0.58x ₩30.98 Billion ₩53.53 Billion ▲ +272.2%
2006 0.16x ₩9.63 Billion ₩61.93 Billion ▲ +46.5%
2005 0.11x ₩6.01 Billion ₩56.59 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.