Curo Co Ltd (015590) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2024: 0.19x

Curo Co Ltd (015590) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of December 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩16.93 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩87.19 Billion) in one year. See Curo Co Ltd (015590) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.19x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩16.93 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩87.19 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Dec 2024
Most recent filing

Curo Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Curo Co Ltd across 17 annual periods. Also explore 015590 shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Curo Co Ltd (2002–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Curo Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 015590 company net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.07x ₩-6.06 Billion ₩87.19 Billion ▼ -199.9%
2023 0.07x ₩6.53 Billion ₩93.84 Billion ▼ -59.8%
2022 0.17x ₩14.34 Billion ₩82.86 Billion ▲ +1099.3%
2021 0.01x ₩979.29 Million ₩67.85 Billion ▼ -92.8%
2020 0.20x ₩18.03 Billion ₩90.34 Billion ▲ +118.3%
2019 0.09x ₩10.90 Billion ₩119.24 Billion ▲ +271.6%
2018 0.02x ₩3.14 Billion ₩127.66 Billion ▲ +118.7%
2017 -0.13x ₩-16.92 Billion ₩128.87 Billion ▼ -182.0%
2016 0.16x ₩28.72 Billion ₩179.29 Billion ▲ +571.0%
2014 -0.03x ₩-7.40 Billion ₩217.68 Billion ▼ -135.1%
2013 0.10x ₩17.70 Billion ₩182.88 Billion ▲ +133.1%
2012 0.04x ₩7.99 Billion ₩192.30 Billion ▲ +143.4%
2011 -0.10x ₩-20.89 Billion ₩218.19 Billion ▼ -133.5%
2009 0.29x ₩34.92 Billion ₩122.23 Billion ▲ +125.6%
2008 0.13x ₩16.75 Billion ₩132.29 Billion ▲ +1.2%
2006 0.13x ₩13.05 Billion ₩104.32 Billion ▼ -17.0%
2002 0.15x ₩24.67 Billion ₩163.66 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.