Lotte Energy Materials Corporation (020150) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.12x

Lotte Energy Materials Corporation (020150) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-51.01 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩412.96 Billion) in one year. See 020150 FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.12x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-51.01 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩412.96 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Lotte Energy Materials Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Lotte Energy Materials Corporation across 14 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lotte Energy Materials Corporation (020150) cash flow conversion.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lotte Energy Materials Corporation (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lotte Energy Materials Corporation. Check 020150 cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.03x ₩-11.05 Billion ₩415.22 Billion ▼ -111.6%
2024 0.23x ₩87.00 Billion ₩380.07 Billion ▲ +208.7%
2023 -0.21x ₩-89.76 Billion ₩426.41 Billion ▼ -421.1%
2022 0.07x ₩28.86 Billion ₩440.19 Billion ▼ -11.3%
2021 0.07x ₩29.90 Billion ₩404.28 Billion ▼ -66.0%
2020 0.22x ₩49.48 Billion ₩227.38 Billion ▼ -4.1%
2019 0.23x ₩48.24 Billion ₩212.72 Billion ▼ -56.8%
2018 0.53x ₩86.02 Billion ₩163.79 Billion ▲ +2.2%
2017 0.51x ₩61.60 Billion ₩119.85 Billion ▼ -32.3%
2016 0.76x ₩72.92 Billion ₩96.07 Billion ▲ +343.9%
2015 0.17x ₩34.86 Billion ₩203.87 Billion ▲ +193.6%
2014 -0.18x ₩-55.45 Billion ₩303.41 Billion ▼ -1221.3%
2013 -0.01x ₩-4.09 Billion ₩295.37 Billion ▼ -104.5%
2012 0.31x ₩61.62 Billion ₩198.76 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.