Woojin Plaimm (049800) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.05x

Woojin Plaimm (049800) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩11.49 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩219.98 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Woojin Plaimm to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.05x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩11.49 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩219.98 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Woojin Plaimm Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Woojin Plaimm across 17 annual periods. Also explore Woojin Plaimm net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Woojin Plaimm (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Woojin Plaimm. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 049800 market cap overview.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.02x ₩5.54 Billion ₩222.48 Billion ▼ -7.8%
2023 0.03x ₩5.72 Billion ₩211.96 Billion ▼ -81.4%
2022 0.14x ₩26.44 Billion ₩182.46 Billion ▲ +31.8%
2021 0.11x ₩21.36 Billion ₩194.24 Billion ▼ -21.4%
2020 0.14x ₩28.96 Billion ₩206.85 Billion ▲ +111.3%
2019 0.07x ₩14.26 Billion ₩215.16 Billion ▲ +19.1%
2018 0.06x ₩12.29 Billion ₩220.98 Billion ▲ +196.1%
2017 -0.06x ₩-13.43 Billion ₩232.01 Billion ▼ -145.6%
2016 0.13x ₩28.48 Billion ₩224.10 Billion ▲ +558.7%
2015 -0.03x ₩-6.33 Billion ₩228.57 Billion ▼ -206.4%
2014 -0.01x ₩-2.48 Billion ₩274.73 Billion ▼ -124.9%
2013 0.04x ₩5.15 Billion ₩142.01 Billion ▲ +23.1%
2012 0.03x ₩3.08 Billion ₩104.41 Billion ▼ -55.5%
2011 0.07x ₩6.45 Billion ₩97.41 Billion ▼ -16.3%
2010 0.08x ₩6.47 Billion ₩81.77 Billion ▼ -21.2%
2009 0.10x ₩6.92 Billion ₩68.96 Billion ▲ +272.7%
2008 0.03x ₩1.66 Billion ₩61.45 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.