Woojin Plaimm (049800) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.05x

Woojin Plaimm (049800) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩11.49 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩219.98 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Woojin Plaimm to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.05x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩11.49 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩219.98 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Woojin Plaimm Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Woojin Plaimm across 17 annual periods. Also explore Woojin Plaimm assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Woojin Plaimm (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Woojin Plaimm. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 049800 company net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.02x ₩5.54 Billion ₩222.48 Billion ▼ -7.8%
2023 0.03x ₩5.72 Billion ₩211.96 Billion ▼ -81.4%
2022 0.14x ₩26.44 Billion ₩182.46 Billion ▲ +31.8%
2021 0.11x ₩21.36 Billion ₩194.24 Billion ▼ -21.4%
2020 0.14x ₩28.96 Billion ₩206.85 Billion ▲ +111.3%
2019 0.07x ₩14.26 Billion ₩215.16 Billion ▲ +19.1%
2018 0.06x ₩12.29 Billion ₩220.98 Billion ▲ +196.1%
2017 -0.06x ₩-13.43 Billion ₩232.01 Billion ▼ -145.6%
2016 0.13x ₩28.48 Billion ₩224.10 Billion ▲ +558.7%
2015 -0.03x ₩-6.33 Billion ₩228.57 Billion ▼ -206.4%
2014 -0.01x ₩-2.48 Billion ₩274.73 Billion ▼ -124.9%
2013 0.04x ₩5.15 Billion ₩142.01 Billion ▲ +23.1%
2012 0.03x ₩3.08 Billion ₩104.41 Billion ▼ -55.5%
2011 0.07x ₩6.45 Billion ₩97.41 Billion ▼ -16.3%
2010 0.08x ₩6.47 Billion ₩81.77 Billion ▼ -21.2%
2009 0.10x ₩6.92 Billion ₩68.96 Billion ▲ +272.7%
2008 0.03x ₩1.66 Billion ₩61.45 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.