Savezone I C (067830) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: 0.05x

Savezone I C (067830) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩6.98 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩152.03 Billion) in one year. See 067830 FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.05x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩6.98 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩152.03 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Savezone I C Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Savezone I C across 17 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Savezone I C operating cash flow efficiency.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Savezone I C (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Savezone I C. Check Savezone I C (067830) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.13x ₩12.44 Billion ₩96.18 Billion ▲ +3782.8%
2024 0.00x ₩-324.48 Million ₩92.42 Billion ▼ -102.5%
2023 0.14x ₩15.65 Billion ₩110.44 Billion ▼ -48.5%
2022 0.28x ₩30.14 Billion ₩109.46 Billion ▲ +108.7%
2021 0.13x ₩14.03 Billion ₩106.32 Billion ▲ +136.9%
2020 0.06x ₩5.98 Billion ₩107.31 Billion ▼ -72.1%
2019 0.20x ₩26.23 Billion ₩131.32 Billion ▲ +203.6%
2018 0.07x ₩9.29 Billion ₩141.16 Billion ▼ -63.8%
2017 0.18x ₩31.42 Billion ₩172.76 Billion ▼ -29.5%
2016 0.26x ₩49.26 Billion ₩190.88 Billion ▲ +72.8%
2015 0.15x ₩28.61 Billion ₩191.53 Billion ▼ -11.6%
2014 0.17x ₩34.08 Billion ₩201.59 Billion ▼ -9.1%
2013 0.19x ₩41.57 Billion ₩223.59 Billion ▲ +275.4%
2012 0.05x ₩11.73 Billion ₩236.96 Billion ▼ -79.3%
2011 0.24x ₩65.61 Billion ₩274.52 Billion ▲ +154.9%
2009 0.09x ₩22.21 Billion ₩236.85 Billion ▲ +412.4%
2008 0.02x ₩3.96 Billion ₩216.35 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.