CJ Cheiljedang (097950) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.03x

CJ Cheiljedang (097950) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩536.28 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩19.00 Trillion) in one year. See 097950 FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩536.28 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩19.00 Trillion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

CJ Cheiljedang Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for CJ Cheiljedang across 17 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of CJ Cheiljedang.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CJ Cheiljedang (2007–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CJ Cheiljedang. Check CJ Cheiljedang (097950) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.14x ₩2.48 Trillion ₩18.19 Trillion ▲ +8.3%
2024 0.13x ₩2.26 Trillion ₩17.91 Trillion ▼ -8.2%
2023 0.14x ₩2.44 Trillion ₩17.83 Trillion ▲ +55.8%
2022 0.09x ₩1.63 Trillion ₩18.48 Trillion ▼ -16.2%
2021 0.11x ₩1.69 Trillion ₩16.05 Trillion ▼ -18.9%
2020 0.13x ₩2.00 Trillion ₩15.45 Trillion ▲ +1.6%
2019 0.13x ₩2.14 Trillion ₩16.80 Trillion ▲ +229.8%
2018 0.04x ₩471.43 Billion ₩12.19 Trillion ▼ -64.9%
2017 0.11x ₩1.18 Trillion ₩10.72 Trillion ▲ +33.6%
2016 0.08x ₩800.14 Billion ₩9.71 Trillion ▼ -40.3%
2015 0.14x ₩1.15 Trillion ₩8.37 Trillion ▲ +69.0%
2014 0.08x ₩688.56 Billion ₩8.43 Trillion ▲ +13.2%
2013 0.07x ₩590.90 Billion ₩8.19 Trillion ▼ -36.0%
2012 0.11x ₩805.05 Billion ₩7.14 Trillion ▲ +470.3%
2010 0.02x ₩64.12 Billion ₩3.24 Trillion ▼ -91.0%
2009 0.22x ₩667.91 Billion ₩3.04 Trillion ▲ +104.1%
2007 0.11x ₩239.92 Billion ₩2.23 Trillion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.