CJ Cheiljedang (097950) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.06x

CJ Cheiljedang (097950) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩1.04 Trillion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩18.19 Trillion) in one year. See 097950 cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.06x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩1.04 Trillion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩18.19 Trillion
KRW

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

CJ Cheiljedang Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for CJ Cheiljedang across 17 annual periods. Also explore CJ Cheiljedang net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CJ Cheiljedang (2007–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CJ Cheiljedang. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CJ Cheiljedang stock valuation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.14x ₩2.48 Trillion ₩18.19 Trillion ▲ +8.3%
2024 0.13x ₩2.26 Trillion ₩17.91 Trillion ▼ -8.2%
2023 0.14x ₩2.44 Trillion ₩17.83 Trillion ▲ +55.8%
2022 0.09x ₩1.63 Trillion ₩18.48 Trillion ▼ -16.2%
2021 0.11x ₩1.69 Trillion ₩16.05 Trillion ▼ -18.9%
2020 0.13x ₩2.00 Trillion ₩15.45 Trillion ▲ +1.6%
2019 0.13x ₩2.14 Trillion ₩16.80 Trillion ▲ +229.8%
2018 0.04x ₩471.43 Billion ₩12.19 Trillion ▼ -64.9%
2017 0.11x ₩1.18 Trillion ₩10.72 Trillion ▲ +33.6%
2016 0.08x ₩800.14 Billion ₩9.71 Trillion ▼ -40.3%
2015 0.14x ₩1.15 Trillion ₩8.37 Trillion ▲ +69.0%
2014 0.08x ₩688.56 Billion ₩8.43 Trillion ▲ +13.2%
2013 0.07x ₩590.90 Billion ₩8.19 Trillion ▼ -36.0%
2012 0.11x ₩805.05 Billion ₩7.14 Trillion ▲ +470.3%
2010 0.02x ₩64.12 Billion ₩3.24 Trillion ▼ -91.0%
2009 0.22x ₩667.91 Billion ₩3.04 Trillion ▲ +104.1%
2007 0.11x ₩239.92 Billion ₩2.23 Trillion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.