CJ Cheiljedang (097950) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.03x

CJ Cheiljedang (097950) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩536.28 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩19.00 Trillion) in one year. Explore CJ Cheiljedang strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩536.28 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩19.00 Trillion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

CJ Cheiljedang Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for CJ Cheiljedang across 17 annual periods. Also explore total assets of CJ Cheiljedang for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CJ Cheiljedang (2007–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CJ Cheiljedang. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is CJ Cheiljedang worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.14x ₩2.48 Trillion ₩18.19 Trillion ▲ +8.3%
2024 0.13x ₩2.26 Trillion ₩17.91 Trillion ▼ -8.2%
2023 0.14x ₩2.44 Trillion ₩17.83 Trillion ▲ +55.8%
2022 0.09x ₩1.63 Trillion ₩18.48 Trillion ▼ -16.2%
2021 0.11x ₩1.69 Trillion ₩16.05 Trillion ▼ -18.9%
2020 0.13x ₩2.00 Trillion ₩15.45 Trillion ▲ +1.6%
2019 0.13x ₩2.14 Trillion ₩16.80 Trillion ▲ +229.8%
2018 0.04x ₩471.43 Billion ₩12.19 Trillion ▼ -64.9%
2017 0.11x ₩1.18 Trillion ₩10.72 Trillion ▲ +33.6%
2016 0.08x ₩800.14 Billion ₩9.71 Trillion ▼ -40.3%
2015 0.14x ₩1.15 Trillion ₩8.37 Trillion ▲ +69.0%
2014 0.08x ₩688.56 Billion ₩8.43 Trillion ▲ +13.2%
2013 0.07x ₩590.90 Billion ₩8.19 Trillion ▼ -36.0%
2012 0.11x ₩805.05 Billion ₩7.14 Trillion ▲ +470.3%
2010 0.02x ₩64.12 Billion ₩3.24 Trillion ▼ -91.0%
2009 0.22x ₩667.91 Billion ₩3.04 Trillion ▲ +104.1%
2007 0.11x ₩239.92 Billion ₩2.23 Trillion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.