Chinyang Hold (100250) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.03x

Chinyang Hold (100250) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-6.42 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩247.70 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Chinyang Hold to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-6.42 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩247.70 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Chinyang Hold Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Chinyang Hold across 17 annual periods. Also explore Chinyang Hold net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chinyang Hold (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chinyang Hold. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 100250 market cap overview.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.10x ₩23.36 Billion ₩225.94 Billion ▲ +144.1%
2023 -0.23x ₩-6.24 Billion ₩26.65 Billion ▼ -653.3%
2022 0.04x ₩8.23 Billion ₩194.46 Billion ▼ -45.2%
2021 0.08x ₩13.59 Billion ₩176.05 Billion ▼ -10.9%
2020 0.09x ₩13.81 Billion ₩159.27 Billion ▼ -42.2%
2019 0.15x ₩21.17 Billion ₩141.26 Billion ▲ +81.3%
2018 0.08x ₩11.33 Billion ₩137.08 Billion ▼ -57.6%
2017 0.19x ₩29.71 Billion ₩152.40 Billion ▲ +57.7%
2016 0.12x ₩19.84 Billion ₩160.49 Billion ▲ +22.6%
2015 0.10x ₩16.98 Billion ₩168.36 Billion ▼ -31.8%
2014 0.15x ₩23.22 Billion ₩157.08 Billion ▼ -8.7%
2013 0.16x ₩26.07 Billion ₩161.08 Billion ▼ -1.7%
2012 0.16x ₩25.50 Billion ₩154.88 Billion ▼ -13.6%
2011 0.19x ₩30.25 Billion ₩158.80 Billion ▲ +55.1%
2010 0.12x ₩12.00 Billion ₩97.74 Billion ▼ -0.2%
2009 0.12x ₩14.49 Billion ₩117.72 Billion ▼ -58.7%
2008 0.30x ₩16.76 Billion ₩56.25 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.