SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd (016250) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.02x

SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd (016250) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-17.61 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩987.40 Billion) in one year. See SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd (016250) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-17.61 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩987.40 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd across 15 annual periods. Also explore SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd (016250) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SGC eTEC E&C Co. Ltd market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.12x ₩-118.46 Billion ₩968.36 Billion ▲ +58.6%
2023 -0.30x ₩-189.61 Billion ₩641.64 Billion ▼ -284.0%
2022 0.16x ₩116.01 Billion ₩722.23 Billion ▲ +2745.8%
2021 -0.01x ₩-2.33 Billion ₩383.06 Billion ▼ -104.7%
2020 0.13x ₩66.91 Billion ₩522.23 Billion ▲ +135.0%
2019 0.05x ₩94.75 Billion ₩1.74 Trillion ▲ +69.7%
2018 0.03x ₩52.34 Billion ₩1.63 Trillion ▼ -73.5%
2017 0.12x ₩184.59 Billion ₩1.52 Trillion ▲ +35.3%
2016 0.09x ₩126.35 Billion ₩1.41 Trillion ▲ +111.1%
2015 0.04x ₩55.00 Billion ₩1.29 Trillion ▼ -13.3%
2014 0.05x ₩49.84 Billion ₩1.02 Trillion ▲ +46.3%
2013 0.03x ₩25.73 Billion ₩768.23 Billion ▼ -78.8%
2011 0.16x ₩34.28 Billion ₩216.65 Billion ▲ +76.0%
2010 0.09x ₩52.95 Billion ₩589.00 Billion ▼ -46.0%
2008 0.17x ₩125.10 Billion ₩751.87 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.