FINEDIGITAL Inc (038950) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.07x

FINEDIGITAL Inc (038950) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩786.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩11.11 Billion) in one year. Explore FINEDIGITAL Inc long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.07x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩786.34 Million
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩11.11 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

FINEDIGITAL Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2004–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for FINEDIGITAL Inc across 17 annual periods. Also explore FINEDIGITAL Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for FINEDIGITAL Inc (2004–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FINEDIGITAL Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FINEDIGITAL Inc market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.22x ₩3.19 Billion ₩14.44 Billion ▲ +5.5%
2023 0.21x ₩1.97 Billion ₩9.42 Billion ▲ +165.4%
2022 -0.32x ₩-5.04 Billion ₩15.75 Billion ▼ -230.1%
2021 0.25x ₩4.27 Billion ₩17.35 Billion ▼ -36.9%
2020 0.39x ₩7.58 Billion ₩19.44 Billion ▼ -43.2%
2019 0.69x ₩14.02 Billion ₩20.43 Billion ▲ +309.5%
2018 -0.33x ₩-5.35 Billion ₩16.33 Billion ▼ -930.9%
2017 0.04x ₩594.73 Million ₩15.09 Billion ▲ +108.6%
2016 -0.46x ₩-6.74 Billion ₩14.72 Billion ▼ -51.6%
2015 -0.30x ₩-3.86 Billion ₩12.77 Billion ▼ -207.9%
2014 0.28x ₩4.38 Billion ₩15.64 Billion ▼ -57.9%
2013 0.67x ₩10.28 Billion ₩15.45 Billion ▲ +5.3%
2012 0.63x ₩13.11 Billion ₩20.76 Billion ▼ -14.7%
2011 0.74x ₩11.20 Billion ₩15.13 Billion ▲ +147.3%
2007 0.30x ₩5.79 Billion ₩19.33 Billion ▼ -36.1%
2006 0.47x ₩9.06 Billion ₩19.37 Billion ▼ -48.5%
2004 0.91x ₩8.18 Billion ₩9.00 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.