YTN Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.01x

YTN Co.Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. YTN Co.Ltd (040300) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-1.08 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩115.29 Billion) in one year. Check how high is YTN Co.Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-1.08 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩115.29 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of YTN Co.Ltd (2005–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of YTN Co.Ltd from 2005 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for YTN Co.Ltd across 14 annual periods. Check how aggressively does YTN Co.Ltd reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

YTN Co.Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2005–2024)

YTN Co.Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2005 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for YTN Co.Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of YTN Co.Ltd.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.02x ₩-2.46 Billion ₩128.29 Billion ▼ -85.9%
2023 -0.01x ₩-1.13 Billion ₩109.35 Billion ▼ -118.8%
2022 0.05x ₩5.76 Billion ₩104.83 Billion ▼ -87.6%
2021 0.44x ₩56.05 Billion ₩126.09 Billion ▲ +108.8%
2020 0.21x ₩23.09 Billion ₩108.43 Billion ▲ +65.1%
2019 0.13x ₩12.72 Billion ₩98.62 Billion ▼ -20.2%
2018 0.16x ₩15.81 Billion ₩97.85 Billion ▼ -17.9%
2017 0.20x ₩21.33 Billion ₩108.47 Billion ▲ +62.7%
2016 0.12x ₩15.59 Billion ₩128.92 Billion ▲ +185.3%
2015 -0.14x ₩-18.02 Billion ₩127.10 Billion ▼ -503.6%
2014 0.04x ₩5.39 Billion ₩153.47 Billion ▼ -77.8%
2007 0.16x ₩23.59 Billion ₩148.92 Billion ▲ +26.6%
2006 0.13x ₩18.41 Billion ₩147.20 Billion ▲ +70.8%
2005 0.07x ₩11.21 Billion ₩153.01 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.