Protec Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: 0.06x

Protec Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Protec Co. Ltd (053610) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩6.24 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩101.04 Billion) in one year. Check 053610 operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.06x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩6.24 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩101.04 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Protec Co. Ltd (2012–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Protec Co. Ltd from 2012 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Protec Co. Ltd across 14 annual periods. Check 053610 capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Protec Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2012–2025)

Protec Co. Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2012 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Protec Co. Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Protec Co. Ltd (053610) cash flow conversion.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.33x ₩29.62 Billion ₩88.72 Billion ▼ -5.5%
2024 0.35x ₩19.07 Billion ₩53.96 Billion ▼ -34.7%
2023 0.54x ₩25.92 Billion ₩47.92 Billion ▼ -11.6%
2022 0.61x ₩46.85 Billion ₩76.60 Billion ▲ +8.6%
2021 0.56x ₩19.81 Billion ₩35.17 Billion ▲ +8.8%
2020 0.52x ₩11.03 Billion ₩21.30 Billion ▼ -82.5%
2019 2.96x ₩76.22 Billion ₩25.76 Billion ▲ +997.5%
2018 0.27x ₩8.96 Billion ₩33.22 Billion ▲ +120.5%
2017 0.12x ₩3.70 Billion ₩30.28 Billion ▼ -80.7%
2016 0.63x ₩18.12 Billion ₩28.67 Billion ▲ +256.4%
2015 0.18x ₩5.18 Billion ₩29.20 Billion ▼ -63.6%
2014 0.49x ₩12.60 Billion ₩25.87 Billion ▲ +55.6%
2013 0.31x ₩7.01 Billion ₩22.40 Billion ▼ -49.1%
2012 0.61x ₩7.50 Billion ₩12.21 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.