N Citron Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: -0.10x

N Citron Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. N Citron Inc (101400) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-897.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩9.06 Billion) in one year. Check N Citron Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.10x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩-897.58 Million
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩9.06 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of N Citron Inc (2011–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of N Citron Inc from 2011 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for N Citron Inc across 14 annual periods. Check 101400 operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

N Citron Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2011–2025)

N Citron Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2011 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for N Citron Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 101400 cash flow metrics.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.15x ₩1.46 Billion ₩9.56 Billion ▲ +241.3%
2024 -0.11x ₩-1.12 Billion ₩10.40 Billion ▼ -130.6%
2023 0.35x ₩2.97 Billion ₩8.41 Billion ▲ +182.0%
2022 -0.43x ₩-3.55 Billion ₩8.24 Billion ▼ -1111.7%
2021 -0.04x ₩-541.28 Million ₩15.22 Billion ▲ +76.8%
2020 -0.15x ₩-1.74 Billion ₩11.38 Billion ▲ +41.6%
2019 -0.26x ₩-5.07 Billion ₩19.31 Billion ▼ -209.1%
2018 -0.08x ₩-2.20 Billion ₩25.91 Billion ▲ +65.0%
2017 -0.24x ₩-5.87 Billion ₩24.22 Billion ▼ -1547.6%
2016 -0.01x ₩-329.23 Million ₩22.37 Billion ▲ +5.4%
2015 -0.02x ₩-316.02 Million ₩20.31 Billion ▲ +93.3%
2014 -0.23x ₩-6.80 Billion ₩29.33 Billion ▼ -235.5%
2012 0.17x ₩3.10 Billion ₩18.11 Billion ▼ -65.4%
2011 0.49x ₩8.74 Billion ₩17.69 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.