Cirata plc (CRTA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: -0.70x

Cirata plc (CRTA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.70x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX-3.46 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (GBX4.94 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Cirata plc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.70x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

GBX-3.46 Million
GBX

Total Liabilities

GBX4.94 Million
GBX

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Cirata plc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Cirata plc across 16 annual periods. Also explore Cirata plc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cirata plc (2009–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cirata plc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cirata plc (CRTA) total market value.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (GBX) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -2.76x GBX-14.77 Million GBX5.35 Million ▲ +41.3%
2023 -4.71x GBX-30.60 Million GBX6.50 Million ▼ -47.9%
2022 -3.18x GBX-27.50 Million GBX8.64 Million ▲ +12.5%
2021 -3.64x GBX-28.23 Million GBX7.76 Million ▼ -135.6%
2020 -1.54x GBX-18.71 Million GBX12.12 Million ▼ -49.7%
2019 -1.03x GBX-13.76 Million GBX13.35 Million ▼ -20.6%
2018 -0.85x GBX-11.34 Million GBX13.28 Million ▼ -1303.3%
2017 0.07x GBX1.73 Million GBX24.42 Million ▲ +148.2%
2016 -0.15x GBX-2.42 Million GBX16.39 Million ▲ +89.6%
2015 -1.41x GBX-17.67 Million GBX12.50 Million ▼ -135.2%
2014 -0.60x GBX-13.55 Million GBX22.56 Million ▲ +17.2%
2013 -0.73x GBX-11.55 Million GBX15.91 Million ▼ -83.3%
2012 -0.40x GBX-4.15 Million GBX10.47 Million ▼ -463.2%
2011 0.11x GBX896.72K GBX8.22 Million ▼ -10.5%
2010 0.12x GBX742.14K GBX6.09 Million ▼ -59.4%
2009 0.30x GBX1.39 Million GBX4.63 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.