LPA Group (LPA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LPA Group (LPA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of GBX-1.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (GBX9.78 Million) in one year. See LPA cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LPA Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LPA Group across 34 annual periods. Also explore LPA Group (LPA) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LPA Group (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LPA Group. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of LPA Group.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (GBX) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.13x | GBX1.25 Million | GBX9.37 Million | ▲ +243.3% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | GBX285.00K | GBX7.31 Million | ▲ +269.6% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | GBX77.00K | GBX7.30 Million | ▼ -93.0% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | GBX1.19 Million | GBX7.89 Million | ▲ +57.3% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | GBX773.00K | GBX8.07 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | GBX660.00K | GBX7.50 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | GBX2.45 Million | GBX8.49 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | GBX1.49 Million | GBX8.22 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | GBX1.22 Million | GBX6.83 Million | ▲ +252.9% |
| 2015 | -0.12x | GBX-714.00K | GBX6.10 Million | ▼ -227.7% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | GBX545.00K | GBX5.95 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | GBX1.31 Million | GBX5.88 Million | ▲ +144.0% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | GBX543.00K | GBX5.94 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | GBX981.00K | GBX3.95 Million | ▲ +527.1% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | GBX-307.00K | GBX5.28 Million | ▼ -131.7% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | GBX791.00K | GBX4.31 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | GBX584.00K | GBX4.91 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | GBX524.00K | GBX5.58 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | GBX469.00K | GBX5.10 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | GBX576.00K | GBX5.00 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | GBX722.00K | GBX5.04 Million | ▲ +339.0% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | GBX187.00K | GBX5.73 Million | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | GBX1.26 Million | GBX5.43 Million | ▲ +584.4% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | GBX277.00K | GBX8.14 Million | ▲ +186.7% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | GBX-287.00K | GBX7.32 Million | ▼ -128.9% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | GBX266.00K | GBX1.96 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | GBX758.00K | GBX2.92 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 1997 | 1.30x | GBX927.00K | GBX711.00K | ▲ +59.8% |
| 1996 | 0.82x | GBX562.00K | GBX689.00K | ▲ +47.8% |
| 1995 | 0.55x | GBX543.00K | GBX984.00K | ▲ +537.2% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | GBX-247.00K | GBX1.96 Million | ▼ -176.8% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | GBX203.00K | GBX1.24 Million | ▲ +91.4% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | GBX127.00K | GBX1.48 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 1991 | 0.18x | GBX234.00K | GBX1.33 Million | — |